clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Proceedings and Debates of the 1850 Constitutional Convention
Volume 101, Page 105   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

105

Spencer, George, Dirickson, McMaster, Fooks, McHenry, Magraw,
Carter, Stewart, of Caroline, Fiery, John Newcomer, Davis,
Waters, Brewer, and Smith.—42.
NEGATIVE.— Messrs. Seliman, Buchanan, Bell, Lloyd, Dick-
inson, Sherwood, of Talbot, Colston, Miller, McLane, Wright,
Jacobs, Shriver, Biser, Annan, Sappington, Stephenson, Nelson,
Thawley, Hardcastle, Gwinn, Ware, Michael Newcomer, Kilgour,
Anderson, Weber, Hollyday, Slicer, Ege, Shower and Brown—30.
So the Convention reconsidered their vote.
Mr. Gwinn, then withdrew his amendment.
The question then recurred upon the resolution offered by the
minority of the committee for that of the majority;
Mr. Spencer, then moved as an amendment to the original re
solution, to strike out all after the enacting clause, and inserte
the following:
Resolved, That the people of the State of Maryland have a
sovereign and inherent right to alter, change or modify their form
of government whenever to them it seems proper.
Resolved, That in the exercise of that right all the delegates
sent by them to this Convention, to frame a new constitution, are
entitled to seats in this body, whether they be Judges, or other
Civil Officers or Ministers of the Gospel.
Which was read.
Mr. Tuck, rose to a point of order, that the amendment was
not germaine to the subject under consideration, and was therefore
not in order;
The President decided the amendment to be in order.
The question again recurred upon the amendment as offered by
Mr. Spencer
Mr. Merrick, moved for a division of the question upon striking
out;
On the question being put on striking out;
Mr. Ege, moved for the yeas and nays, which being ordered,
appeared as follows:
AFFIRMATIVE—Messrs. Miller, Spencer, George,Wright, Sh river,
Biser, Annan, Sappington, Stephenson, Nelson, Carter, Stewart,
of Caroline, Gwinn, Brent of Balt, city, Michael Newcomer,
Brewer. Anderson, Hollyday, Fitzpatrick, Ege and Cockey—21.
NEGATIVE—Messrs. Chapman, Pres't, Morgan, Dent, Hopewell,
Ricaud, Lee, Chambers, of Kent, Mitchell, Donaldson, Wells,
Randall, Weems, Merrick, Buchanan, Bell, Dickinson, Sherwood,
of Tal., Colston, John Dennis, James U. Dennis, Dashiell, Williams,
Hodson, Goldsborough, Eccleston, Phelps, McLane, Tuck, Sprigg,
McCubbin, Bowling, Dirickson, McMaster, Hearn, Fooks, Jacobs,
Magraw, Thawley, Hardcastle, Ware, Fiery, John Newcomer,
Kilgour, Davis, Waters, Weber, Slicer, Smith, Shower and
Brown—50.
So the Convention refused to strike out.
14



 

clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Proceedings and Debates of the 1850 Constitutional Convention
Volume 101, Page 105   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  October 06, 2023
Maryland State Archives