clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Proceedings of the House of Delegates, 1799
Volume 98, Page 7   View pdf image (33K)
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space
VOTES and PROCEEDINGS, November, 1799.            7

    A petition from William Frazier, of Montgomery county, praying an act of insolvency, was
preferred, read, and referred to the committee appointed on petitions of a similar nature.
    On the second reading of the report of the committege of elections and privileges, agreeably to
the order of the day, the question was put, That the house concur with the first part of said report?
Resolved in the affirmative.
    On progression in reading the said report, the question was put upon the following resolution,
viz. RESOLVED, That this house will proceed to the examination of the conduct of the sheriff of
Baltimore county, and the facts stated in the petition of Charles Ridgely, of William, touching
and concerning the said election, on Tuesday week next?  Resolved in the affirmative.
    ORDERED, That the clerk of this house, at the request of any of the parties concerned, issue
subpœnas for witnesses, commanding their attendance at the bar of this house on the morning of
Tuesday week next, and that a copy of the above order be served on the sheriff of Baltimore
county.
    On further progression in reading the said report, RESOLVED, That this house will proceed to
the examination of the conduct of the sheriff of Montgomery county, and the facts stated in the
petition of Lawrence Oneale, touching and concerning the said election, on Friday next.
    ORDERED, That the clerk of this house, at the request of any of the parties concerned, issue
subpœnas for witnesses, commanding their attendance at the bar of this house on the morning of
Friday next, and that a copy of the above order be served on the sheriff of Montgomery county.
    On further progression in reading the said report, the question was put, That the house concur
with that part of the said report which relates to the election of delegates for Frederick county?
The yeas and nays being required, appeared as follow:

A    F    F    I    R    M    A    T    I    V    E.
Messieurs
Hall,
McPherson,
Digges, 
Lemmon,
Brown,
Love,
Nabb,
Denny,
Duckett,
Quynn,
Wright,
C. Frazier,
Thompson,
Lowrey,
McComas,
Orrell,
Boon,
Buchanan,
Johonnot,
Geoghegan,
McClain,
Cellar,
Riley,
Swearingen,
Perry,
Tomlinson,
Beall,
Haynes. 

 
28.
N    E    G    A    T    I    V    E.
Messieurs
Leigh,
Neale,
Wroth,
Dunn,
Bogden,
Worthington,
Carcaud,
Taney,
Brome,
Carroll,
Rose,
Hyland,
S. Frazier,
Pattison,
Goldsborough,
Wallace,
Addison,
Marbury,
Calvert,
Key,
Purnell,
Gunby,
Franklin,
Street,
Ayres,
Bond,
Mason,
Magruder,
Turner,
Rice. 

 
30.
So it was determined in the negative.
    RESOLVED, That the return of the sheriff of Frederick county is a valid constitutional return,
and the persons returned by him as delegates are entitled to their seats in this house.
    On motion, the question was put, That the report of the committee, so far as relates to Washington
county, be postponed till Friday next, the delegates wishing to be heard by counsel at the
bar of the house in support of the return of the sheriff?  The yeas and nays being required, appeared
as follow:
A    F    F    I    R    M    A    T    I    V    E.
Messieurs
Hall,
Digges, 
Lemmon,
Brown,
Love,
Rose,
Nabb,
Denny,
Haynes,
Duckett,
Quynn,
Wright,
C. Frazier,
Thompson,
Lowrey,
Street,
McComas,
Ayres,
Bond,
Mason,
Orrell,
Boon,
Buchanan,
Johonnot,
Riley,
Swearingen,
Tomlinson,
Beall,
Rice. 

 
29.
N    E    G    A    T    I    V    E.
Messieurs
Leigh,
Neale,
Wroth,
Dunn,
Brogden,
Worthington,
Carcaud,
Taney,
Brome,
McPherson,
Carroll,
Hyland,
S. Frazier,
Pattison,
Goldsborough,
Wallace,
Addison,
Marbury,
Calvert,
Key,
Purnell,
Gunby,
Franklin,
Sappington,
Thomas,
Shriver,
Magruder,
Perry. 

 
28.
So it was resolved in the affirmative.
    On motion, the question was put, That the house reconsider the last question?  The yeas and
nays being required, appeared as follow:
A    F    F    I    R    M    A    T    I    V    E.
Messieurs
Leigh,
Neale,
Wroth,
Dunn,
Bogden,
Worthington,
Carcaud,
Taney,
Brome,
McPherson,
Carroll,
Hyland,
S. Frazier,
Pattison,
Goldsborough,
Haynes,
Wallace,
Addison,
Marbury,
Calvert,
Key,
Purnell,
Gunby,
Franklin,
Sappington,
Thomas,
Shriver,
Magruder,
Turner,
Perry. 

 
30.
N    E    G    A    T    I    V    E.
Messieurs
Hall,
Digges, 
Lemmon,
Brown,
Love,
Rose,
Nabb,
Denny,
Duckett,
Quynn,
Wright,
C. Frazier,
Thompson,
Lowrey,
Street,
McComas,
Ayres,
Bond,
Mason,
Orrell,
Boon,
Buchanan,
Johonnot,
Geoghegan,
McClain,
Cellar,
Riley,
Swearingen,
Tomlinson,
Beall,
Rice. 

 
31.
So it was determined in the negative.
The house adjourns till Monday morning 9 o'clock.

M    O    N    D    A    Y,    November 11, 1799.

    THE house met.  Present the same members as on Saturday.  The proceedings of Saturday
were read.  Mr., Walter Mackall, a delegate returned for Calvert county, Mr. henry
Ridgely Warfield, a delegate returned for Frederick county, Mr. Luke White Barber, a delegate
returned for Saint-Mary's county, Mr. John Edmondson, a delegate returned for Talbot county,
Mr. Richard Hall Harwood, a delegate returned for Anne-Arundel county, Mr. John Wilkins,
Mr. Alexander Stewart and Mr. John Cottman, three delegates returned for Somerset county,
Mr. Philip Thomas, a delegate returned for Cæcil county, and Mr. Matthew Keene, a delegate

 

clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Proceedings of the House of Delegates, 1799
Volume 98, Page 7   View pdf image (33K)   << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  October 06, 2023
Maryland State Archives