AN ACT to refund to Clinton A. Wright, trustee of the Avon
Bottling Company of Baltimore City; Frank Sandkuhler,
Tonsa Schultz, administratrix of Leopold Schultz, deceased;
Frank A. Worintz and Nathan Weiller, co-partners, trading
as Worintz & Company, and W. J. Wickham and B. Born-
heim, co-partners, trading as the Bayside Bottling Company
of Baltimore City, the amounts of money paid respectively
by them to the Clerk of the Court of Common Pleas of Bal-
timore City for licenses for the years 1890 and 1891 in ex-
cess of the amounts with which they were properly charge-
able, and which respective amounts have been paid by said
Clerk to the State.
|
Balto. City.
|
WHEREAS, On the first day of May, 1890, the Avon Bot-
tling Company of Baltimore City, Frank Sandkuhler, Leopold
Schultz, Edward A. Worintz and Nathan Weiller, co-partners,
trading as Worintz & Company, and W. J. Wickham and B.
Bornheim, co-partners, trading as the Bayside Bottling Com-
pany of Baltimore City, respectively, engaged in the business
of bottling malt liquors in Baltimore City, did pay to John T.
Gray, the Clerk of the Court of Common Pleas of Baltimore
City, the sum of two hundred and fifty dollars each, respec-
tively, for licenses as wholesale liquor dealers, when in fact
they were not such wholesale liquor dealers, but merely bot-
tlers; and
WHEREAS, The said the Avon Bottling Company of Balti-
more City and Leopold Schultz did, on the first day of May,
1891, each paid to the said clerk a like sum of two hundred
and fifty dollars for the like license for the year 1891, which
respective payments were made under protest; and
WHEREAS, The said clerk did, on the first day of May,
1892, decline to demand and receive from the aforesaid parties
the said sums of two hundred and fifty dollars, but did de-
mand and receive from them only the sum of thirty dollars
each, respectively, for licenses as traders to retail spirituous
and fermented liquors, and has since demanded and received
from them annually only such sum of thirty dollars each for
traders' licenses, as aforesaid, until the passage of the Act of
the General Assembly of eighteen hundred and ninety-four,
Chapter eighty-six, providing for licenses for bottling spirit-
uous and fermented liquors, which said traders' licenses is the
only one which they should have been required to procure in
the years 1890 and 1891; therefore,
|
Refund.
|