clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Session Laws, 1900
Volume 97, Page 689   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

JOHN WALTER SMITH, ESQ., GOVERNOR.
CHAPTER 407.

689

AN ACT to refund to Clinton A. Wright, trustee of the Avon
Bottling Company of Baltimore City; Frank Sandkuhler,
Tonsa Schultz, administratrix of Leopold Schultz, deceased;
Frank A. Worintz and Nathan Weiller, co-partners, trading
as Worintz & Company, and W. J. Wickham and B. Born-
heim, co-partners, trading as the Bayside Bottling Company
of Baltimore City, the amounts of money paid respectively
by them to the Clerk of the Court of Common Pleas of Bal-
timore City for licenses for the years 1890 and 1891 in ex-
cess of the amounts with which they were properly charge-
able, and which respective amounts have been paid by said
Clerk to the State.

Balto. City.

WHEREAS, On the first day of May, 1890, the Avon Bot-
tling Company of Baltimore City, Frank Sandkuhler, Leopold
Schultz, Edward A. Worintz and Nathan Weiller, co-partners,
trading as Worintz & Company, and W. J. Wickham and B.
Bornheim, co-partners, trading as the Bayside Bottling Com-
pany of Baltimore City, respectively, engaged in the business
of bottling malt liquors in Baltimore City, did pay to John T.
Gray, the Clerk of the Court of Common Pleas of Baltimore
City, the sum of two hundred and fifty dollars each, respec-
tively, for licenses as wholesale liquor dealers, when in fact
they were not such wholesale liquor dealers, but merely bot-
tlers; and
WHEREAS, The said the Avon Bottling Company of Balti-
more City and Leopold Schultz did, on the first day of May,
1891, each paid to the said clerk a like sum of two hundred
and fifty dollars for the like license for the year 1891, which
respective payments were made under protest; and

WHEREAS, The said clerk did, on the first day of May,
1892, decline to demand and receive from the aforesaid parties
the said sums of two hundred and fifty dollars, but did de-
mand and receive from them only the sum of thirty dollars
each, respectively, for licenses as traders to retail spirituous
and fermented liquors, and has since demanded and received
from them annually only such sum of thirty dollars each for
traders' licenses, as aforesaid, until the passage of the Act of
the General Assembly of eighteen hundred and ninety-four,
Chapter eighty-six, providing for licenses for bottling spirit-
uous and fermented liquors, which said traders' licenses is the
only one which they should have been required to procure in
the years 1890 and 1891; therefore,

Refund.



 
clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Session Laws, 1900
Volume 97, Page 689   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  October 06, 2023
Maryland State Archives