Volume 96, Page 1475 View pdf image (33K) |
1900.] OF THE SENATE. 1475 Crothers, Wilkinson, Dennis, Williams, of Har., Dick, Williams, of A. A. —22. NEGATIVE—None. Mr. Williams, of Harford, moved that the Senate re- consider the vote by which said bill was passed by yeas and nays as amended. Which motion prevailed. Mr. Wilkinson moved that further consideration of said bill be indefinitely postponed. Which motion was rejected by yeas and nays as fol- lows: AFFIRMATIVE. Messrs. Baker, Messick, Gray, Wilkinson—--5. Marsh, NEGATIVE. Messrs. President, Kirwan, Applegarth, Moore, Beasman, Moses, Boule, Peter, Brewington, Putzel, Bryan, Ravenscroft, Dennis, Rohrback, Dick, Williams, of Har., Dodson, Williams, of A. A. —18. Mr. Williams, of Harford, moved that the Senate non- concur in the amendment proposed by the House of Delegates to said bill. Which motion prevailed by yeas and nays as follows: AFFIRMATIVE. Messrs. President, Kirwan, Applegarth, Messick, Baker, Moore, Beasman, Moses, Betts, Peter, Bouic, Putzel, Brewington, Ravenscroft, Bryan, Rohrback, |
||||
Volume 96, Page 1475 View pdf image (33K) |
Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!
|
An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact
mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.