| Volume 96, Page 1172 View pdf image (33K) |
|
1172 JOURNAL OF PROCEEDINGS [Mar. 30 said companies as if it had been fixed in the said ordi- nance, and the Governor shall fix the compensation to be paid to said persons, one-half of which shall be paid by the said companies and the other half by the Mayor and City Council of Baltimore. "Sec. 3. And be it furtherenacted, That nothing in this Act shall be construed as to give to the telephone com- panies therein mentioned any greater rights than those described in the Ordinance of the Mayor and City Coun- cil of Baltimore, No. 41, approved May 9, 1889; and all further exercise of such rights by said companies is here- by made dependent upon the acceptance by the said com- panies of this Act within thirty days from its approval, and the filing of a certificate of said acceptance in the office of the Secretary of State. "Sec. 4. And be it enacted, That this Act shall take effect frm the date of its passage." PROPOSED SUBSTITUTE TO AMENDMENT PROPOSED. By Mr. Bryan, At end of section 1 add the following: "Provided, however, that the repeal of said Act shall not be construed to, in any way, interfere with the exist- ing ducts of the Chesapeake and Potomac Telephone Company." Which proposed substitute to amendment proposed was rejected by yeas and nays, as follows: AFFIRMATIVE. Messrs. President, Kirwan, Applegarth, Moore, Baker. Moses, Bryan, Peter, Gray, Putzel—10. NEGATIVE. Messrs. Beasman, Marsh, Betts, Messick, Bouic, Ravenscroft, Brewington, Rohrback, Crothers, Wilkinson, Dennis, Williams, of Har., Dick, Williams, of A. A. Dodson, —15. |
||||
|
| ||||
|
| ||||
| Volume 96, Page 1172 View pdf image (33K) |
|
Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!
|
An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact
mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.