772 JOURNAL OF PROCEEDINGS [Mar. 8

AMENDMENT PROPOSED.

After the word "help, " in line 6 of section 26, add
"provided that this Act shall not apply to Washington
county. "

Which amendment was rejected.

The question then recurring upon the passage of the
bill,

The yeas and nays was called and appeared as follows;.
AFFIRMATIVE.

Messrs.

Speaker, Lakin, Real,
King, Mitchell, Johnson,
Stewart, Proctor, Staley,
Collins, Hopkins, Clark,
Dudley, of Tal., Foster, Deets,
Corkran, Dunn, Hutton,
Pattison, Knott, Norris, of Car.,
Linthicum, Lehmayer, Walsh,
Mackie, Latrobe, Wolfe,
Kimble, Martenet, Waller,
Norman, Siegmund, Roberts,
Anderson, of Wor., Cover, Bennett—37.
Waters,

NEGATIVE.
Messrs.

Garner, Dryden, Bramble,
Kendall, Disharoon, Sanford,
Norris, of Kent, Merrick, Curtis,
Krems, Perkins, Long,
Feldmeyer, Dudley, of Q. A., Biggs,
Simmons, Buckey, Frenzel,
Gibson, Brown, of Fred., Radcliife,
Lancaster, Satterfield, Close,
Truitt, of Bal. co., Lednum, Critchfield,
Mann, Scrimger, Graeff,
Sandman, Gately, Anderson, of Car.,
Jeffers, Brown, of Bal. city, Wilson,
Ward, Mencke, Finzel—39.

The bill therefore failed for want of a constitutional
majority.