MARYLAND COURT OF APPEALS 565

for his S^d Debt and where and whether he received Judgmt thereon and if
by removal of Transcript of the Record into the Prov^l Court he had Execu-
tion by Elegit for his whole Cost and Damages or what you know of that
matter and whether the Same was Executed if not by what means it was pre-
vented 3. Do you know of any Lands or Tenements the Said Brewerton was
Seized or possessed of at or before the time the Complainant took his Said
Execution. Do you know have heard or been Credibly informed that the
Said Brewerton did then or at any other Time and when by Deed or Deeds
duly Executed Convey Assigne or make over the S^d Lands or any and what
part thereof together with all or any of his personal Estate to the Deft Adams
or any other person or to any other in Trust for him or any other person
and to Whom was the Same made for a valuable Consideration or only under
Colour and w^th intent to Defraud the Complainant and deprive him of the
Benefitt of his Execution and if in the Said Deed or Deeds there is Valuable
Consideration mentioned what was the Sum as you can remember was the
S^a Brewertons Intentions thereby to Apply the Same [759] Towards Satis-
faction of the Compl^ts Demands did he Actually and bona fide receive Such
Consideration or Sum of Tob^o of the S^d Adams or of any other person on his
Account or did you Apprehend their Aggreem^t to be that the DeP Adams
Should pay it for him to the Compl^t and thereby Undertake to Discharge the
whole Damages and Costs recovered as af" was the Same or on their Accounts
to the Compl^t or if all or most part of the Compl^ts Debt and Costs is Still
unpaid by whose means and Contrivance do you beleive the Complainant
was prevented from recovering the Same by his Execution and thereby Oc-
casion the Suit now Depending 4. Do you know of any other Matter or thing
touching the matters in Question that may tend to the benefit! or Advantage
of the CompP in this Cause beside what you have been before Interrogated

linfo Dprlare the Same fully and at Large as i£ you had been thereunto par-
ticularly Interrogated.

Depositions of the Wittnesses Taken at the House of Thomas Gillis in
Somersett County upon the Twelfth Day of May 1724 by Virtue of a Com-
mission issuing out of the Lord Propr^ys High Court ... of Chancery to us
Directed for the Examination of Wittnesses in a Cause here Depending
between John Caldwell Compl^t and W^m Brewerton and Alexander Adams
def^t8.

Jonathan Raymond Sen^r of Stepney Parish in Somersett County Aged
about 50 years Sworn and Examined on the part of the Compl^t Says as fol-
lows Viz^t

1^st That he well knows the parties Compl^ts and Defe^ts.

2^dly That he hath often heard that the Def Brewerton was indebted to
the Compl^t about five or Six Thousand Pounds of Tob^o for the Like Sum
paid by the Compl^t (when it was worth two pence Per Ib) to Sundry persons
in Discharge of Debts which the Said Brewerton Owed and that he hath also