352 MARYLAND COURT OF APPEALS

MARYLAND ss^t Charles absolute Lord and Propry of the Provinces of
Maryland and Avalon Lord Baron of Baltemore etc: To the Sherriff of Ann-
arundell County Greeting Wee Command [541] You that of the Goods and
Chatties of Jonathan Forward late of the City of London Merch^t als diet
Jonathan Forward of Annarundell County Merchant you cause to be made
as well the Sum of Six hundred pounds Sterling and Six thousand four hun-
dred and fifty one pounds of Tobacco Certain damages as also the sum of
twelve hundred and Seventy three pounds of Tobacco Costs of suit which
a Certain Gilbert Powlson Mariner recovered against him in Our Provincial
Court of Maryland before our Justices thereof on the ao^th day of September
last whereof he is Convict and when you have the same so made or any part
thereof the same in your Custody Safe keep so that you have the same before
the Justices of our Provinciall Court to be held at Annapolis the first Tues-
day in April next to Satisfie unto the said Gilbert Powlson his damages and
Costs af^d hereof faile not at your perrill and have then there this Writt Witt-
ness Samuel Young Esq^r Cheif Justice of our Provinciall Court the first day
of October in the 5^th year of our Domⁿ etc: Annoque Domi. 1720

Th Bordley.

Vachel Denton Clk.

Att which said first tuesday of April to Witt the fourth day of the same
month Anno Domi 1721 being the day of the return of the said Writt Comes
the Sherriff of Annarundell County to whom the same was Directed and
makes return thereof to the Court here Endorst in these Words Viz^t

Nulla Bona

Step" Warman Sherr:

In testimony whereof the seale of the provincial Court is hereunto Af-
fixed this 2O^th day of April Anno 1721 [Provincial Seale]

Vachel Denton Cl.

[542] Afterwards to witt on the same 20^th day of April Anno Domi Seven-
teen hundred and twenty one in the same Writt mentioned Comes hereinto
Court the afs^d Jonathan Forward by Daniel Dulany his Attorney and sayth
that as well in the Record and process afs^a as in the Judgm^t af^d it is Mani-
festly Erred.

1...... It is Erred in this that the Judgm^t af¹ is rendred for the said Gil-
bert against the said Jonathan whereas the same ought to have been rendred
for the said Jonathan against the said Gilbert.

2...... It is Erred in this that the Writt of Enquiry of damages was

Issued Executed and Judgm^t rendered for the damages the Same day.

3...... It is Erred in this that the several Executions Awarded on the

same Judgm^t are in themselves improper and Erronious. For which Errors
and many other's in the Record Process and Judgm^t af^d and Awarding Exe-
cution thereon the said Jonathan Prays that the said Judgm^t be reversed and
held for none and that he to all he thereby lost may be restored and that the