clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Proceedings of the Maryland Court of Appeals, 1695-1729
Volume 77, Page 334   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

334 MARYLAND COURT OF APPEALS

pause the Agent replyed that if said [510] Ward had made any false Sug-
gestions or allegations such were intirely to his own Detriment for that
he looked upon the patent lyable to be cancelled and further saith not.
April the 6th 1722 W Fitz Redmond

Sworn to the Day and year aforementioned before me

Saml Young

Whereupon afterwards on the Seventh day of April Anno Domi Seven-
teen hundred and twenty two in the same Court or term upon the hearing
the record and whole Proceedings of the Chancery Court to the rendring the
Decree there as the afsd Appeale and Petition and Causes therein by the
Appellant for Erors in Equity assigned being seen and by the Court here
more fully understood and deligently examined for that it appeareth to the
same Court that the Decree rendred in the Chancery Court was according
to Equity and conscience.

Therefore it is Considered that the Decree ala in all things be affirmed
and remain in all it's force Vigor and Effect and the injunction afsd be per-
petuall notwithstanding the afsd Causes and Matters for Errors above As-
signed and further by the same Court it is Considered that the Appeallee shall
recover against the afsd Appellt his Costs in this Court and in the Court of
Chancery.

[DD] Thomas Hicks v Sewards heir
Appeale

Bond lodged in Court by the Appellant to prosecute his Appeale with
Effect an [sic] Daniel Dulany of Councill for the Appellant moves that if any
other Person appears as appealee [511] The Appellant will give further Se-
curity Thomas Bordley appears for the appealee with liberty to make his
Exceptions to the irregularity of the proceedings next Court as he might do
this Court. Time given to the Councill for the Appellant to file his reasons
of Appeale untill the first of June next.

[DD,] Davison v [TB: Atfny Gen»] Majesty Writt of Error. This
Cause abated by the death of the Plantiff; [DD] Davison v [TB Atfny
Genll] Majesty Writt of Error This Cause abated by the death of the Plan-
tiff; [TB:] James Frisby v [DD:] John Snow Writt of Error and Transcript.
Se fa issued Notice thereof given to Samll Perry Attorney in fact for John
Snow. Cont; [DD:] Jonathan Forward v [TB] Gilbert Powlson Writt of
Error; [DD] Bennett Hoskins v [TB:] John Causeen's Lessee Writt Diminu-
tion Issued. Record on Diminution returned. Saturday April the 7th 1722
Demr filed; [DD] Thomas Hicks v Sewards heir Appeale Vide Minutes, The
above last Specified Four Causes are Continued till the third tuesday in
July next.

The Court adjourns untill the third tuesday in July next.

Test William Gumming} Clk


 

clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Proceedings of the Maryland Court of Appeals, 1695-1729
Volume 77, Page 334   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  August 16, 2024
Maryland State Archives