MARYLAND COURT OF APPEALS I95
may proceed to the Examination as well of the record and process aforesaid
as of the matters aforesaid above for Errors assigned and that the said Mary
who since the rendring the rendring [sic] the said Judgment intermarryed
with Philemon Hemsley Gentn to the Errors aforesaid May rejoyne.
Da Dullany per Quer.
Thereupon Comes As well the said Philo Hemsley Gentn and Mary his
wife Exr* of the aforesaid John Contee Esqr by Thomas Bordley their Attor-
ney, as the Said Sr Edmond Prideaux et uxr Excrx of the said Sr John Rogers
by Danl Dullany their attorney, and the said Philo and Mary by their said
Attorney prays leave to imparle hereunto untill next Court and he hath it
and the same day is given to the Plantiffs also.
Att which said next Court to witt the twenty Seaventh day of Sept Anno-
que Dmi 1714 this cause is continued untill the next Court and day is fur-
ther given to partys plantiffs and defendts untill the next Courts.
Att which said next Court to witt the tenth day of March Anno Domi
1714 comes againe the party's plantiffs and Defendts aforesaid by their Attor-
neys aforesaid and the said Philemon Hemsley and Mary his Wife Exri as afd
by Thomas Bordley their attry saith [299] that neither in the Record and
process nor in the rendring of Judgment aforesaid it is in any thing Erred
prays the Court of our Lord the King here (her late Majty Queen Anne of
Glorious memory being dead) will procceed to Examinacon of the Record
and process aforesaid Th Bordley and the said Danll Dullany also Dan
Dallany.
Now here at this day to witt the day and Year last mentioned the whole
procceedings aforesai[d] being read heard and by the Court here fully un-
derstood It is thereupon considerd by the Cort the same day and Year that the
Judgment of the Provinciall Court aforesaid rendred in the cause aforesaid
for the Errors in the Record and process being be reversed anulld and alto-
geath[er] held for none and that the said Sr Edmond Prideaux and Dame
Mary his wife Execrx as aforesaid to all things that the said Sir John Rogers
in his life time or they the said Sr Edmond and Mary his wife lost thereby
be restored and thereof have execucon and the Defts in mercy.
[300] Michl Millers Exrs v Her Majty
This cause standing for hearing now here at this day to witt the tenth
day of March Annoque Dmi i7i45 comes again as well Thoms Macnemara
Esqr especially in this Cause assigned and appointed to defend the Errors
aforesaid assigned for our Sovereigne Lord King George that now is (our
late SoVeigne Lady Queen Anne being deceas'd) as the said Michaell Miller
Executor of the aforesaid Arthur Miller by Thos. Bordley his attorney afd
alsoe, and the said Thoms Macnemara Saith that neither in the record and
process nor in the rendring of Judgment aforesaid it is in any thing erred
and of this he prays the Court of of [sic] our Lord the King here will proceed
|