clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Proceedings of the Maryland Court of Appeals, 1695-1729
Volume 77, Page 126   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

126 MARYLAND COURT OF APPEALS

ings of the said Court as alsoe in the rendring of the Judgment the said Notley
prays that the same be reversed and set aside And he to what he hath thereby
Lost may be restored.

Gouldsborough

[187] And the said Defendants by their Atfy aforesaid saith that forasmuch
as the Writt of the said Notley Rozier Specifies At A Court of his Majty etc.
Whereas it should have been his late Majty King William etc. the Record
thereupon transmitted to this Court is not according to the tenour of the
said Writt and therefore prays the Writt aforesd may be quasht.

And now here at this day to witt the twenty Sixth day of July Anno Dmi
1710 all and every the proceedings aforesaid being read heard and by the
Board here fully understood It is the Judgment of the whole Court that
the Record aforesaid is not duely returned According to the tenour of the
said Writt.

And it is thereupon considerd that the Writt aforesaid so as aforesaid
brought and every matter and thing therein contain'd be quasht disanulld
and all togeather held for nought etc.

Edward and Dudley Charlton agt Nicholas Sporne
In Chancery on Bill of Review

The Bill and answer being read and the Arguments on both sides being
fully heard and understood It is Orderd by the Court here the 26th July
1710 that the cause be dismissed And that Order of this Court Issue to the
Register in Chancery that the bills formerly Lodgd in his hands for the debt
and former Costs of suits in Chancery in this Action be deliverd up to the
said Nicholas Sporne or his order. Thereupon the compls Councill prays
an Appeale to her Majty and Councill in Brittain may be granted which is
allowd of Giving Securely etc.

In Error Mitchells Admrs v Dmna Regina, Millers Execrs v The Same,
Lynes Exrx v The same, Edward Hammond v Jno Watts et uxr, Blakes Admrs
v Thos Wharton, All continued; [188] Wm Coursey Esqr agt Richd Bishop
Orderd on this Cause that Scire Facias Issue to Richd Bishop heire to hear
Errors returnable to next Court; [CC—TM] Magdalen Edmondson Admrl
James Edmondson agt Hugh Hall Admr Hall The defendant in this Cause
by Wornell Hunt his Attorney appears and imparles till next Court.

The Court Adjourns to the 26 Octobr abinde 6th March

Th Jones Clr

At A Court of our Sovereigne Lady Queen Anne of Great Brittain
France and Ireland defender of the faith etc. held for hearing Appeals and
regulating Writts of Error this 6th March 1710 in the 9th Yeare of her said
Majestys Reigne etc. Annoque Dmi 1710.
Were present: The Honoble Coll Edwd Loyd President; Coll Wm Holland;


 

clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Proceedings of the Maryland Court of Appeals, 1695-1729
Volume 77, Page 126   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  October 06, 2023
Maryland State Archives