| Volume 70, Page 225 View pdf image (33K) |
Provincial Court Proceedings, 1682. 225
Dominion of the Right Honoble Charles Lord Baltemore &c Annoq Liber W. C.
Doni One thousand six hundred Eighty two: Att wch day came
Aswell the said plt by Anthony Undrwood his Attorney as the said
deft by Thomas Burford his Attorney, And the said plt by his said
Attorney Sayth, That he by any thing before alleadged [Ought]
not to be barred from haveing his accon aforesaid because he saith p. 578
that long before the same time of the Trespasse and Ejectment
aforesaid done, and before the said James Peterkin or the Same
John Rawlings under whome he Claymes had any thing in the
same Two hundred Acres of land Called Plaine dealeing the same
six hundred and fifty Acres of land called Alexanders place Men
tioned in the Said Declaration was in the actuall posession & was
the Proper land of the Said Henry Osbourne deceased under
whome the said Anthony & Rebecca & Thomas and Sarah who
demised the Same to the said plt Claymes, & were Seized thereof
in their Demeasne as of ffee, and that the same two hundred
Acres of land called plaine dealeing or the Major part thereof is
within the antient bounds of the said Six hundred & fifty Acres of
land Called Alexandrs place, And the markeing of Trees for sur
veying the said Two hundred Acres of land Called Plaine dealeing
and the Entring thereupon is the Trespasse and Ejectment whereof
the Said Roger hath above Complained And this he prayeth may
be Enquired of by the Country. And the said Deft likewise There
fore Itt is Comanded the Sheriffe of St Maryes County that he
Cause to come here Twelve &c. by whome &c. And who neither &c.
To Recognize &c. because aswell &c.
On wch said fourteenth day of October in the yeare aforesaid
Came the Said Partyes by their Attorneys aforesaid, and the Jurors
Impannelled being Called likewise came to witt Philip Lynes, Collen
Mackensey, Andrew Wheatley Abraham Baker, Thomas Simpson.
Thomas heath Richard Keene, Andrew Abington, Edmond Der
mott, Arthur Wheatley Thomas Smithson & James Bigger Who
being elected tryed and Sworne to Say the truth of the premisses
upon their Oathes doe Say That the said James Peterkin is in noe
wise guilty of the Trespasse and Ejectment above by the said
Roger Eades Imposed upon him in such manner and forme as the
said Roger hath Complained against him Therefore Itt is Con
sidered by the Court here that the said Roger Eades take nothing
by his writt aforesaid but for his false Clayme therein be mercy,
and that the said James Peterkin goe thereof without Day And that
the said James Peterkin Recover against the said Roger Eades the
sume of pounds of Tobacco for his Costs
and Charges by him about his defence in this behalfe Layd out
and expended. And the said James Peterkin may have thereof
Execution
|
||||
|
| ||||
|
| ||||
| Volume 70, Page 225 View pdf image (33K) |
|
Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!
|
An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact
mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.