222 Provincial Court Proceedings, 1679.

Liber N N

Humphry Davenport agt Tho: Hathud & ux :

This action is agreed

	Richard Walker agt John Shancks
	the same agt Tho: Lomax Tho: Tailor agt Jno Rawlings	These three causes being upon writts of Errors are continued untill next Court

John Staynes agt Ann Jones

This cause being upon an Appeale from Calvert County Court, & the Appellant by George Parker his Attorney being ready to prosecute the same, but the Defendt not appearing, this cause is continued untill next Court

George Robins agt Robert Bryan

Robert Bryan was Attached to Answer unto George Robins in a plea of trespas Assault & battery And the said Robert Bryan by Robert Ridgely his Attorney cometh & defendeth the force & in jury when

&c And the said George Robins although solemnly called came not to
preferre his declaration & prosecute his writt against the said Robert
Bryan Therefore itt is considered by the Court here this day to witt
the Sixth day of June in the fourth yeare of the Dominion of
Charles Lord Baltemore &c Annoq Doni 1679 that the said George
Robins take nothing by his writt, but be in mercy for his false claime
And that the said Robert Bryan recover against the said George
Robins the Sume of Eight hundred fifty fiue pounds of tobacco for
his costs & charges by him about his defence in this behalfe laid
out & expended And the said Robert Bryan may haue thereof
Execution

George Robins agt Robert Bryan

Robert Bryan was Attached to Answer unto George Robins in a plea of trespas upon the case And the said Robert Bryan by Robert Ridgely his Attorney cometh & defendeth the force & in-

p. 877

jury when &c And the said George Robins although solemnly called came not to preferre his declaracon & prosecute his writt against the said Robert Bryan Therefore itt is considered by the Court here this day to witt the Sixth day of June in The fourth yeare of the Dominion of Charles Lord Baltemore &c Annoq Doni 1679, that the said George Robins take nothing by his writt, but be in mercy