| Volume 67, Page 346 View pdf image (33K) |
346 Provincial Court Proceedings, 1677/8.
Liber N N Afterwards to witt on the same day came the jurors aforesaid &
with unanimous consent did deliver their Verdict by their fforeman
Wm Hopkins namely that they all found for the plaintiffe.
Whereas Henry Stocket late high Sheriffe of this County was
plaintiffe & Robert Peca defendt in a plea of trespas on the case And
the plaintiffe by a jury of the Countrey recovered from the defendt
the full & just Sume or quantity of two thousand six hundred
pounds of tobacco & caske wrongfully taken by the Defendt out of
the said Henrys custody, & by him the said Defendt conveyed to places
unknown to the said Henry Itt it considered here that the said
Del endt shall forthwith pay or satisfie to the said Henry the plain
tiffe or his order the said sume or quantity of two thousand six
hundred pets of tobacco & cask together with costs & court Charges
ats ExecucOn
Ordered likewise that Thomas Knightons engagemt to pay a cer
taine sume of tobacco to Cot Samuel Chew, & the said Cot Chews
receipt of part of the said sume subscribed under the said Engagemt
be entred on Record which are as followeth vizt
Superscription
These for the Honrd Cot Samuell Chew prsent
Sr
This my float shall engage me to satisfie unto you two thousand
foure hundred pounds of tobacco upon the account of my Landlord
Robert Peca, itt being for rent from
Yor Servant Tho: Knighton
4th Novembr 1675
Recd in part of this noat One thousand eight hundred twenty two
pounds of tobacco by me—Samuell Chew
ffeb: 15th day 1675 lb tob
The bill of costs amounts to 941
As by the transcript of the said Record remaining upon Record in
the Secretaryes Office relation being thereunto had may appeare.
Afterwards to witt the said thirteenth day of ffebruary aforesaid
came as well the said Robert Peca by Robert Carvile his Attorney
as the said Henry Stocket by George Parker his Attorney as afore
said And the said Robert Peca saith, that in the Record & proces
abovesaid as in the rendring of the judgemt aforesaid itt is manifestly
erred in this vizt.
Whereas itt is menconed in the Record att the tyme when the
judgemt was given, was given, prsent Comrs Cot Wm Burges, Major
jst Samuel Lane Capt Richard Hill, Nathaniel Heathcoat. Itt is evi
dent to be made appeare that W Burges Mr Lane & Mr Heathcoat
were not there prsent, but only Mr Richard Hill, so that the Record
is Vitious false & erronious.
The Record is also false & vitious in this, that the first writt on
wch Peca was taken was returnable the thirteenth of June. And itt
|
||||
|
| ||||
|
| ||||
| Volume 67, Page 346 View pdf image (33K) |
|
Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!
|
An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact
mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.