Volume 57, Page 171 View pdf image (33K) |
Provincial Court Proceedings, 1667. 171 Whereupon Ordred that a Veniri facias issue to the sherriffe of Liber FF Caluert County to warne 36 men of the Neighbourhood in and about the Clifts to serue as Jurors on behalf e of the Lord Propr next Pro- uinall Court Patrick Hinderson sett to the Barre held up his hand and was arraigned, Pleaded not Guilty, and put himselfe upon the Country Philip Burgess sett to the Barr held up his hand and was arraigned, Pleaded not Guilty, and put himself e upon the Country Mary Veitch sett to the Barr, held up her hand and was arraigned, Pleaded not Guilty, and put herselfe upon the Country Henry Mitchell being called to answere the indictmt found agt him last Court, and was demanded wether hee does Confess to it or trauers, whereupon hee trauers the said Indictmt, and put in his plea by Tho: Nottley his Attorney and puts himselfe upon the Coun- try and the Ld Propr likewise The Sherriffe of St Marys County returnes the names of the petty Jury as followeth Foreman Samuell Chew Roger Birtch John Eason Robt Tylor Tho: Paine Tho: Boylston John Sollars Tho: Hinton John Hopper Wm King Robt Corke Rob: Gooddrick Who answered att the first call and sworne in Court as allsoe all Euidences likewise sworne in Court after which the Jury retire'd by themselues The Petty comes into Court, they answering to theire names and [p. 453] said they were all agreed in theire uerdicts which are as followeth Mary Veitch not Guilty Philip Burgess not Guilty Patrick Hinderson Guilty Henry Mitchell Guilty of a Tresspass against the Ld Propr for whipping of James Cullum and doe allow the said Cullum twelue pence damage, whereupon the Court told them they were not to Con- sider of any dathage, therefore theire Verdict receiued as onely Guilty of the tresspass &c Mary Veitch and Philip Burgess Clear'd by Proclamacon noe prson coming in agt them Patrick Hindersons Indictmt not expressing the uallue of the sheape the Court did Consider thereof that it ought to be incerted, hath therefore Ordered that the said Hinderson doe remaine in the sherriffes Custody untill next Prouinall Court, then to appeare upon the said Indictmt which is to Containe the said matter) onely the price of the sheape soe stollen by him to bee incerted therein |
||||
Volume 57, Page 171 View pdf image (33K) |
Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!
|
An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact
mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.