| Volume 57, Page 171 View pdf image (33K) |
Provincial Court Proceedings, 1667. 171
Whereupon Ordred that a Veniri facias issue to the sherriffe of Liber FF
Caluert County to warne 36 men of the Neighbourhood in and about
the Clifts to serue as Jurors on behalf e of the Lord Propr next Pro-
uinall Court
Patrick Hinderson sett to the Barre held up his hand and was
arraigned, Pleaded not Guilty, and put himselfe upon the Country
Philip Burgess sett to the Barr held up his hand and was arraigned,
Pleaded not Guilty, and put himself e upon the Country
Mary Veitch sett to the Barr, held up her hand and was arraigned,
Pleaded not Guilty, and put herselfe upon the Country
Henry Mitchell being called to answere the indictmt found agt him
last Court, and was demanded wether hee does Confess to it or
trauers, whereupon hee trauers the said Indictmt, and put in his
plea by Tho: Nottley his Attorney and puts himselfe upon the Coun-
try and the Ld Propr likewise
The Sherriffe of St Marys County returnes the names of the petty
Jury as followeth
Foreman Samuell Chew Roger Birtch
John Eason Robt Tylor
Tho: Paine Tho: Boylston
John Sollars Tho: Hinton
John Hopper Wm King
Robt Corke Rob: Gooddrick
Who answered att the first call and sworne in Court as allsoe all
Euidences likewise sworne in Court after which the Jury retire'd by
themselues
The Petty comes into Court, they answering to theire names and [p. 453]
said they were all agreed in theire uerdicts which are as followeth
Mary Veitch not Guilty
Philip Burgess not Guilty
Patrick Hinderson Guilty
Henry Mitchell Guilty of a Tresspass against the Ld Propr for
whipping of James Cullum and doe allow the said Cullum twelue
pence damage, whereupon the Court told them they were not to Con-
sider of any dathage, therefore theire Verdict receiued as onely Guilty
of the tresspass &c
Mary Veitch and Philip Burgess Clear'd by Proclamacon noe
prson coming in agt them
Patrick Hindersons Indictmt not expressing the uallue of the
sheape the Court did Consider thereof that it ought to be incerted,
hath therefore Ordered that the said Hinderson doe remaine in the
sherriffes Custody untill next Prouinall Court, then to appeare upon
the said Indictmt which is to Containe the said matter) onely the
price of the sheape soe stollen by him to bee incerted therein
|
||||
|
| ||||
|
| ||||
| Volume 57, Page 171 View pdf image (33K) |
|
Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!
|
An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact
mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.