170        Provincial Court Proceedings, 1667.

       Liber FF The Grand Jury returnes into Court and deliuers in theire verdicts
              on the back of the Indictmt agt Henry Mitchell concerning James
              Cullum thus Billa Vera

               Also on the back side of that Indictmt agt Dan: Stringer is it
              thus endorct (uizt) The Grand Jury in the behalfe of the Rigt
              Honble the Lord Propr doth prsent Daniel Stringer for being Guilty
              of stealing of a hogg

               On the papers agt Henry Mitchell Joseph James & John Boulton
              they returne this uerdict
               The Grand Jury in the behalf e of the Rigt Honble the Lord Propr
              doth prsent Henry Mitchell Joseph James and John Boulton Guilty
              of stealing of a hogg of John Tuckers

               On the papers agt Patrick Hinderson was theire uerdict endorc't
              uizt
               The Grand Jury in the behalfe of the Rt Honble the Lord Propr
              doth prsent Patrick Hinderson for being guilty of stealing of a sheape
              belonging to Richard Bayley

               On the back side of the papers deliuered the Grand Jury agt
              Philip Burgess was theire uerdict thus endorced
               The Grand Jury in the behalfe of the Rigt Honble the Lord Pro-
              prietary doth prsent Philip Burgess for being Guilty of stealing of
              a hogg belonging to Francis Parrott

               On the back side of the papers deliuered the Grand Jury agt Wil-
              liam Smyth of Caluert County planter was the said Jurys uerdict thus
              endorc't (uizt) Ignoramus

               On the back side of the papers deliuered the Grand Jury agt James
              Veitch and Mary his wife was the said Jurys uerdict thus endorct
               The Grand Jury in the behalf e of the Rigt Honble the Lord Propr
              doth prsent Mary Veitch for suspicon of Murder of sarah Feakeley,
              As to James Veitch wee returne Ignoramus

       [p. 452] James Veitch and William Smyth Clear'd by Proclamacon noe
              prson coming in agt any of them
               Henry Mitchell Daniel Stringer Joseph James and John Boulton
              Patrick Hinderson and Philip Burgess and Mary Veitch the Prison-
              ers was sett to the Barre
               Daniel Stringer being called to hold up his hand att the Barre
              and was arraigned Pleaded Guilty, whereupon the Act of Assembly
              being read wherein it is said that none but those whome shall be
              legally Conuicted &c: whereupon he confessing the fact, was not
              thereof by a Jury Conuicted, therefore Clear'd by Proclamacon
               Henry Mitchell Joseph James and John Boulton being called the
              said Mitchell humbly desired that they be tryed by a Jury of his
              Neighbours,