Volume 57, Page 170 View pdf image (33K) |
170 Provincial Court Proceedings, 1667. Liber FF The Grand Jury returnes into Court and deliuers in theire verdicts on the back of the Indictmt agt Henry Mitchell concerning James Cullum thus Billa Vera Also on the back side of that Indictmt agt Dan: Stringer is it thus endorct (uizt) The Grand Jury in the behalfe of the Rigt Honble the Lord Propr doth prsent Daniel Stringer for being Guilty of stealing of a hogg On the papers agt Henry Mitchell Joseph James & John Boulton they returne this uerdict The Grand Jury in the behalf e of the Rigt Honble the Lord Propr doth prsent Henry Mitchell Joseph James and John Boulton Guilty of stealing of a hogg of John Tuckers On the papers agt Patrick Hinderson was theire uerdict endorc't uizt The Grand Jury in the behalfe of the Rt Honble the Lord Propr doth prsent Patrick Hinderson for being guilty of stealing of a sheape belonging to Richard Bayley On the back side of the papers deliuered the Grand Jury agt Philip Burgess was theire uerdict thus endorced The Grand Jury in the behalfe of the Rigt Honble the Lord Pro- prietary doth prsent Philip Burgess for being Guilty of stealing of a hogg belonging to Francis Parrott On the back side of the papers deliuered the Grand Jury agt Wil- liam Smyth of Caluert County planter was the said Jurys uerdict thus endorc't (uizt) Ignoramus On the back side of the papers deliuered the Grand Jury agt James Veitch and Mary his wife was the said Jurys uerdict thus endorct The Grand Jury in the behalf e of the Rigt Honble the Lord Propr doth prsent Mary Veitch for suspicon of Murder of sarah Feakeley, As to James Veitch wee returne Ignoramus [p. 452] James Veitch and William Smyth Clear'd by Proclamacon noe prson coming in agt any of them Henry Mitchell Daniel Stringer Joseph James and John Boulton Patrick Hinderson and Philip Burgess and Mary Veitch the Prison- ers was sett to the Barre Daniel Stringer being called to hold up his hand att the Barre and was arraigned Pleaded Guilty, whereupon the Act of Assembly being read wherein it is said that none but those whome shall be legally Conuicted &c: whereupon he confessing the fact, was not thereof by a Jury Conuicted, therefore Clear'd by Proclamacon Henry Mitchell Joseph James and John Boulton being called the said Mitchell humbly desired that they be tryed by a Jury of his Neighbours, |
||||
Volume 57, Page 170 View pdf image (33K) |
Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!
|
An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact
mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.