| Volume 54, Page 211 View pdf image (33K) |
Kent County Court Proceedings, 1656-1662.211
Mr Joseph Weeks the Atturny of Mr Leeake haue Craued a Refer- Liber B
ence which the Court hath Granted and hath apoynted Mt Weeks to
bringe his Euidence to the Court beinge apoynted the first Day of may
next wheare W Browne or his Attur are also to make thayre
Apearance
Ann Doob Ann Hill & Catheren Gammer sworne in Court saith
That Elesabeth Lockett begunn hur Laboure on teusday night and
so Remained tell wensday night and about Cooke Crowing she wase
Deliuered and all that euer she Confest wase that it wase thomas
Brights Child and your Deponants asked hur wt hur master Dide to
hure in the husks in the tobaco house and she answered so well as
she could that hur master Did butt tickell hur and we Cauld hur into
the sheed wheare Mistres blunt and Ann Doob Examiened hure
agayne and bade hure speak the Trewth and kathern Gammer heard
us and all that Euer she Confest wase that she neuer knew any other
mane in three quarters of a yeare and that she neuer knew hur Master
but by his face and Hands and that the Child wase goote when hur
Master wase att Seueren wheare that night thomas Bright would
not goe to beed butt lay upon the forme and when the saruants wase
aslepe he came to the beed to hur and that night the Child wase goote
and when the Childs heed wase in the Birth Mrs Blunt tooke the booke
and swore hure & all that she said it wase thomas Brights Child and
further saith not signum
Ann Doobe
Catheren Gammer
Ann Hill
Sarah Tourson sworne in Court
Saith That she cann Remmember nothing but that she still cried
oute on thomas Bright and further saith not
the marke of
Sarah Tourson
Elesabeth Lockett sworne in Court saith that Thomas Bright wase
the father of hure Child and no other mane but himself and that
theare wase a peace of Munny brooken betwext theme and that he
promised hur Mariege before the Child wase gott and further saith
not the marke of
Elesabeth Lockett
Whearas Elesabeth Lookett and thomas Bright hath binn plainly
Convicted for basterdy the Court passinge Judgment that the said
Elesabeth should haue twenty lashes on hur backe well layd on she
hath Craued the bennefett of the Act of Indemnity which the Court
doth grant and doth order that Thomas Bright shall pay the Chargges
that did Inshue by thayre unlaw full doinge and Cost of seut only the
|
||||
|
| ||||
|
| ||||
| Volume 54, Page 211 View pdf image (33K) |
|
Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!
|
An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact
mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.