Volume 54, Page 211 View pdf image (33K) |
Kent County Court Proceedings, 1656-1662.211 Mr Joseph Weeks the Atturny of Mr Leeake haue Craued a Refer- Liber B ence which the Court hath Granted and hath apoynted Mt Weeks to bringe his Euidence to the Court beinge apoynted the first Day of may next wheare W Browne or his Attur are also to make thayre Apearance Ann Doob Ann Hill & Catheren Gammer sworne in Court saith That Elesabeth Lockett begunn hur Laboure on teusday night and so Remained tell wensday night and about Cooke Crowing she wase Deliuered and all that euer she Confest wase that it wase thomas Brights Child and your Deponants asked hur wt hur master Dide to hure in the husks in the tobaco house and she answered so well as she could that hur master Did butt tickell hur and we Cauld hur into the sheed wheare Mistres blunt and Ann Doob Examiened hure agayne and bade hure speak the Trewth and kathern Gammer heard us and all that Euer she Confest wase that she neuer knew any other mane in three quarters of a yeare and that she neuer knew hur Master but by his face and Hands and that the Child wase goote when hur Master wase att Seueren wheare that night thomas Bright would not goe to beed butt lay upon the forme and when the saruants wase aslepe he came to the beed to hur and that night the Child wase goote and when the Childs heed wase in the Birth Mrs Blunt tooke the booke and swore hure & all that she said it wase thomas Brights Child and further saith not signum Ann Doobe Catheren Gammer Ann Hill Sarah Tourson sworne in Court Saith That she cann Remmember nothing but that she still cried oute on thomas Bright and further saith not the marke of Sarah Tourson Elesabeth Lockett sworne in Court saith that Thomas Bright wase the father of hure Child and no other mane but himself and that theare wase a peace of Munny brooken betwext theme and that he promised hur Mariege before the Child wase gott and further saith not the marke of Elesabeth Lockett Whearas Elesabeth Lookett and thomas Bright hath binn plainly Convicted for basterdy the Court passinge Judgment that the said Elesabeth should haue twenty lashes on hur backe well layd on she hath Craued the bennefett of the Act of Indemnity which the Court doth grant and doth order that Thomas Bright shall pay the Chargges that did Inshue by thayre unlaw full doinge and Cost of seut only the |
||||
Volume 54, Page 211 View pdf image (33K) |
Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!
|
An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact
mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.