| Volume 51, Page 275 View pdf image (33K) |
Chancery Court Proceedings, 1679. 275
discharged by James Pattison the assignee and present possessor of Liber C D
the other fifty acres of Land and the Jury afores.d do upon their Oaths
further Say That the Said Robert Sheale dyed without any issue of
his Body Lawfully begotten and left no heir at Law to him the Said
Robert to Inherit in the Land afores.d nor made any Disposition
thereof to any pson whatsoever in his life time to the knowledge
of the Jurors af.' But by what Right or Title the s.d Bridgett dureing
her widowhood or the Said Gregory & Bridgett Since their Inter
marriage held the Same or the sd Gregory now holds the Same the
Jurors aforesaid are wholly Ignorant
- John Manley
Commission
Robert Carvile
Stephen Murty sealed John Noble sealed
Stephen Gough sealed John Bayly sealed
Abram Taylor sealed Rich.d Birkheadsealed
John Brown Tho Nottinghamsealed
W.m Shercliffesealed Tho Salmon sealed
Ja.8 Pattison sealed Dan.” Hammond sealed
Which being Read and heard It is the Judgm.t of the Court here
this day to wit the 23th day of November in the year of the p. 225
Dominion of the R.t Hon.ble Charles Lord Baltemore &c Annocp (fol. 273)
Dom 168o that the fifty acres of Land in the aforegoing Inquisition
menconed where the Said Robert Sheale dyed Seized is Escheated
unto his Said Lordship for want of an heir
To the Hon.blee Justices of the Provinciall Court (fol. 274)
The humble Petition of Richard Hill Gent Sheweth
That one Thomas Bland in may 1679 did Exhibit his Bill of
Comp.lt into this Court ag.t Edward Dorsey & his wife & other
defend.ts and amongst others that he named defend.ts yo.r Pet.r was
one that was Served with a Sp.a Returnable 4th may to Answer
the Said Bill to w.ch your pet.r appeared & haveing appeared and
perused the Said Comp.lts Bill doth find the Same to be meerly
Vexatious & to put your pet.r to unnecessary Expences & Charges
in takeing out Copys of Long pleadings and to putting him to great
pain & trouble in travelling to the Court about the Same yo.r pet.r
being no ways concerned or any ways privy to any y.e transactions
Between the Said p.lt and defend.ts Dorsey and his wife who are
y.e onely defend.ts haveing denyed all Combination Charged against
him by the pits with any the other def.ts and the p.lts have So far
pceeded as they are Ready for a hearing without this defend.ts
answer So that it is plain that yo.r petition.r is no materiall defend.t
to the Said Bill
|
||||
|
| ||||
|
| ||||
| Volume 51, Page 275 View pdf image (33K) |
|
Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!
|
An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact
mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.