|
L. H. J.
Liber No. 47
June 1
|
receive any Benefit from Traffick, or are provided with suitable
Presents for them, That therefore you cannot consistent with your
Duty, increase any Charge upon your Constituents for this Purpose ;
however, I think it my Duty to observe to you, That many Warriors
of the Six Nations often pass through this Province in order to
make War on the Catawbaws, and expect that we and our neigh-
bouring Colonies should provide for them in their March, and if they
should be refused, it cannot be doubted, but that they would take it
by Violence: And I am apprehensive, That as the Governments to
the Southward as well as the Northward of us, allow those Warriors
Provisions in their March, that were they to be refused the like
Allowance in this Province, they would consider such Refusal as a
Violation of the Treaties with us, and be induced to treat our back
Inhabitants as Enemies, and how far the Consequence may reach,
cannot be easily foreseen: It is easy to prevent any Evils of this
Kind, by making a proper Provision for those People at the Public
Expence, which is but a mere Trifle, in Comparison with the Safety
of the People. Sam: Ogle
Which was read, and ordered to lie on the Table.
The House adjourns until Monday Morning 8 of the Clock.
|
|
|
June 3
|
Monday Morning, June 3, 1751.
The House met according to Adjournment: The Members were
called, and all appeared as on Saturday, except Mr. Wilkinson and
Mr. Baxter. The Proceedings of Saturday were read.
Col. Henry, from the Committee of Laws, delivers to Mr. Speaker
a Bill entituled, An Act for regulating the Interest upon Tobacco
and Money; which was read the first Time, and ordered to lie on the
Table.
Mr. Bordley delivers to Mr. Speaker a Bill entituled, An Act for
erecting a new Market-House in the City of Annapolis; which was
read the first Time, and ordered to lie on the Table.
The House adjourns until 2 of the Clock.
|
|
|
p. 142
|
Post Meridiem.
The House met according to Adjournment.
On motion of a Member, the Question was put, Whether the fol-
lowing Question shall be now put; viz. Whether Mr. Robert Yeates
be discharged from any further Attendance on this House; or Not ?
Resolved in the Negative.
|
|