322 Provincial Court Proceedings, 1659.

Liber
P. C. R.

Land from his s^d Brother. The s^d M^r Henry Coursey alleaging, th^t
it is allready Surueyed for him. And humbly Craueth th^t M^r Wil-
liam Coursey may declare & informe the Court whither or noe hee
did understand th^t the Pet^r had marked th^t Land there. And whither
hee hath surueyed that Land for his Brother, now in dispute, yea or
noe?
Will^m Coursey, Sayth uppon Oath, That goeing to suruey Land on
the Easterne shoare, he found a Tree marked there w^th an (H) &
understood by M^r Ringhould th^t M^r Hinson had marked some trees
in th^t place: But knew not in what Branch hee had marked them; for
in the Creeke there were Two branches. And that hee hath not
surueyed th^t Land for his Brother Henry, or any other, now claymed
by M^r Hinson.
Ordered therefore th^t the Surueyo^r Suruey that Land specifyed
and marked by M^r Hinson, for the s^d Hinsons use.

Kent
County
Limits

It is Ordered that those Plantaons allready seated, or to bee seated
on the Easterne shoare adioyning & neare to the Isle of Kent, shall
bee esteemed as belonging to Kent County, till further Order therein
from the Gou^r & Councell to the Contrary.

Attorney
General v.
Thurston
Vide 3 Md.
Arch. Coun.
364

Was called afore the Board Thomas Thurstone & demanded why
being formerly banished this prouince, hee hath presumed to returne
hither againe contrary to an Order sett forth & published on the 23^th
day of July last, in contempts of his L^ps authority here. Deluding
the poeple w^th uisions & such like fancies uery preiudiciall to his L^ps
peace & gouerm^t, & noe small disturbance to the quiett of the whole
prouince.
In answere thereto the s^d Thomas Thurstone Sayth That hee hath
not bene in the prouince aboue Twelue dayes & therfore doth not
conceaue th^t That Order hath relaon to him being in the prouince att
the making & publishing thereof. That hee hath not done any thing,
since his arryuall, preiudiciall to the peace of his L^p, or quiett of the
Prouince: Neyther doth hee conceaue that hee hath bene formerly
banished.
Whereuppon the Court Ordered this following Order to be drawne
up and published. [See 3 Md. Arch. Coun. 364]
The Gouerno^r dissolued the Court.

p. 291
Aug. 4
Vid. fol. 263
Sheriff of
Kent v.
Sowth

writt of Exeqⁿ issued to the Sheriffe of Kent for his Sheriffs &
Clerks ffees uppon the goods &c of Thomas Sowth, in th^t Cause
iudged betweene him the s^d Sowth & John Salter besides ffee of
Exeqⁿ & Ciks fee for the writt 23^l.

Sheriff of
Anne
Arundel v.
Larkin
Vid. fol. 258

Writt of Exeqⁿ issued to the Sheriffe of Anarundel County &c:
agst John Larkin for 1000^l Tob. according to Order of Court 25
Aprill 1659, Besides Clk ffees Order & Copie 32 writt Exeqn 23 55