clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Proceedings of the Provincial Court, 1658-1662
Volume 41, Page 234   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space


234 Provincial Court Proceedings, 1658.

Liber
P. C. R.

Writt to the Sheriffe of St Maries County to attatch &c: Ret next
Prouinciall Court.

mrk Cattle

Thomas Gerard Esqr Recordeth his marke for Bramley howse
of Cattle & hoggs (contrary to the mark of St Clemts Mannor) Viz
ffowre de Luce on the Right eare, & underkeeld on the left eare.
Allso he recordeth his marke for Basford Mannor (Viz) Cropd'
on both eares.

February 28
p. 191

Munday 28th of ffebruary
Pnte

Josias ffendall Esqr Gour
Philip Caluert Esqr Secr.
Capt Willm Stone

Mr Robt Clearke
Mr Job Chandler
Dr Luke Barber

Mr Baker Brooke
Mr Edw: Lloyde

Cornewaleys
v. Chandler
and Overzee

Vnto the plfs Bill of Complaynt in Chancery. The Defts putt in
their Answers according as is demand in the sd Bill.

Vid. the
Complaynt
fol. 143

To the honble Josias ffendall Gouernor of Maryland. The answere
of Job Chandler to the Complaynt of Capt Thomas Cornewaleys in
Chancery. Humbly Sheweth That whereas he Sayth That uppon a
Tract of Land wch Coll Yardley tooke up att Portoback, & his seating
negros uppon itt Caused him to giue Creditt to the sd Coll Yardley &
one Nathaniel Batt, wch was as the deft hath heard, for noe more
then a Watch of small price & ualue. In answere to the abouesd
premises the deft sayth, That the Credr should haue done well to
haue made better Inquisition into his Debrs Creditt: ffor the Estate
wch the Credr wth the Land, Sayth caused him to trust him, or them,
did solely & properly belong unto his Mother in Law, Mrs Sarah
Yardley, being purchased by her Estate, & the sd Coll Yardley by a
Bill under his hand to his sd mother in Law before his marriage,
was not to haue any claime or interest in, during her life. And
where the plf Sayth That after an Attatchmt was serued That the
deft did by his instigaon stop the proceedings of the Attatchmt.
The wch the deft utterly denyeth, being att tht time att Annarundell,
& came not from thence in seauen or eight weeks after. And tht
there were Two other Attatchmts att the same time serued, as this
Depont will make appeare: And tht if the Attorney of the Complaynt
had bene as carefull of his Interest, as they to whom the other Two
Attatchmts were graunted, hee knoweth not butt hee had had satis-
faction as well as they allthough to the best of this Defendts know-
ledge, the Attatchmts were graunted about Three weekes after the
Decease of the sd Coll Yardley, wch hee supposeth illegall, The order
hauing past agst the sd Coll Yardley long before in his life time.
And as Concerning his second Attatchmt, graunted unto his Attorney



 
clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Proceedings of the Provincial Court, 1658-1662
Volume 41, Page 234   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  October 06, 2023
Maryland State Archives