| Volume 25, Page 497 View pdf image (33K) |
|
Proceedings of the Council of Maryland, 1728. 497
so that the whole matter Contained in the said Representation Lib. X. is as this Respondent is advised Clearly out of the before recited Provisoe and Consequently this Respondent answer able to the said Philip Lee only by due Course of Law And the Respondent further sheweth that the said Re presentation is a Complaint in the nature of an Original Suit Charging the Respondent with withholding from the said Philip something that he Claims as right which the Respon dent is advised is altogether Improper for your Honours Con sideration in the first Instance not being more triable by your Honours than other Suit or Controversy whatsoever and that your Honours Cannot as this Respondent is advised Apply the proper and only Remedy which the Law hath Given the said Philip if he has any just Claim against the Respondent which is to Award him damages which only can be Assessed by a Jury The Respondent further humbly shews your Honours that by the 29th Chapter of Magna Charta no man is to be taken or imprisoned or disseised of his Freehold or Liberties or Free Customs or Outlawed or Exiled or otherwise destroyed or Condemned but by lawful Judgment of his Peers or by the Law of the Land That by a statute made the 25th of Edward the third Chap ter 4th it is Enacted that from thenceforth none shall be taken by Suggestion or Petition to the King or his Council unless by p. 210 Indictment or presentment of good and lawful people of the neighbourhood or by Process by writt Originall at Common Law and that none shall be put out of his Franchise or Free hold but by Course of the Common Law and by another Statute made 76 Chas Chap 10 It is enacted and declared that neither his Majesty nor his privy Council had or ought to have any Iurisdiction power or Authority by English Bill petition Articles Libell or any other Arbitrary way whatsoever to examine or draw into Question Determine or dispose of the Lands Tenements Hereditaments Goods or Chattels of any the Subjects of the Kingdom of England but that the same ought to be tried and determined in the Ordinary Courts of Iustice and by the Ordinary Course of the Law And the Respondent further saith that in as much as the Representation is in the nature of an originall Suit for a matter Clearly out of the Act of Assembly Mentioned in the repre sentation and only examinable and Triable by the Course of the Common Law & tends to subvert Trialls by Jury and is in the Example of it (as the respondent is advised) Dangerous to the Liberty of the Subject The Respondent Claims the Benefit of defending himself touching any Claim the said Philip Lee might have against
|
||||
|
| ||||
|
| ||||
| Volume 25, Page 497 View pdf image (33K) |
|
Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!
|
An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact
mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.