Volume 10, Page 256 View pdf image (33K) |
256 Court and Testamentary Business, 1649 50.
Liber B. Charges and Such Damages as this Honble Court Shall award for the prejudice he hath received by the non paymt thereof. And yor Petiticonr Shall Ever pray Mr ffrancis Brookes by Upon Reading of an Order Capt Willm Mitchell his Attorn plte made in this Cause 25to Novem John Dandy Defendanther last whereby the Compit was
directed to procure Some discharge or other note to Satisfie the Court what Tobaccos Colonell Nathaniell Littleton had received either of him the Compit or the Defendt in Satisfac- tion of the debt in the Said Order Mentioned or other direct proofe of paymt And it being more made appeare unto this Court on the compltes behalf that the Compit had paid to the Defendant in Bills accepted and to Colonell Litleton (as appeared by his Lres) 2810 l of Tobacco and Caske Soe as there remained only one hundred and ninety pounds of Tob: p. 436 and Caske unpaid of the three thousand pounds of Tobacco for Security of paymt whereof the Cattell in question were Mortgaged or bound over to the defendt which one hundred and Ninety the Complt was ready to pay, It is therefore upon full hearing what could be alledged on either party now Ordered that the Complt paying to the defendt the Said one hundred and Ninety pounds of Tobacco and Caske he the Said defendt is to deliver all the Cattell he received upon the Bill of Mortgage with their Increase to the Complt at St Inegos ffort, and is alsoe to Secure the Said Complt from all Damage he may happen to Sustaine by the defendts not paymt of the Remainder of the Tobaccos payable to Colonell Litleton for the Shallop. But in regard the deft had Some Cause as appeared to the Court to question the paymts before mentioned the whole Charges of Court in this Cause is Equally to be borne and paid by both parties in this Suite.
Capt William Mitchell plte The Compft declaring against Lt Nicholas Gwyther Sheriffe deft the deft upon an Action of the Case for that he the defendt being Sheriffe of St Maries County Served a Writt of Execucon upon his the pltes Estate granted by one who (as the pite alledged) had no power to grant the Same and before a former Execution made out against his pson was duely returned. And for that the Said Sheriffe Contrary to the Law of England (as the plt alledged) had Administred an Oath unto the Appraisers upon that Execution fOr the true Appraismt of the Estate Executed, which he had not power to doe, And had alsoe taken into his possession a Wastcoate of the pltes wch was not at all valued or Executed to the Compltes great Damage as he pretended To which the Sheriffe Answered that his proceedings in the
|
||||
Volume 10, Page 256 View pdf image (33K) |
Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!
|
An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact
mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.