Volume 10, Page 237 View pdf image (33K) |
Court and Testamentary Business, 1649 50.237
due to the Estate of the Said mr Coopar deceased, And I doe Liber B. further ingage my Self that in Case mr Dames received a Bill fifteen hundred pounds of Tobacco, which was in part of the debt above Mentioned that the Said mr Dames Shall returne to the Said mr Manning the Said Bill of fifteen hundred pounds and if in Case he hath received all or any part thereof that then the Said mr Dames to be accomptable for what he hath received, Wittness my hand this 9th January 1652 Henry Coursey In the presence of Tho: Hatton 5th decembr 1646
Upon the Petition of James Linsey Attorney of Cornelius Canoda against Thomas Gerrard Esq &c It is this day ordered by the Court that the Said Cornelius be at the Court in the first of March next, by himself or Attorney to Answer to the Allegation of the Said mr Gerrard, and that mr Gerard keep the wages due to Cornelius in his hand as his Security till the Said Cornelius have made answer as aforesaid John Lewger
John and Richard Sturman doe Jointly and Severally bind themselves for the appearance of William Hardwich at the next generall Assembly to be held for this Province to answer to the Suit of Thomas Cornwallis Esq in an Action of the Case Either by himself or his Attorney and to abide the Order of Court, And this in the penalty of tenn Thousand pounds of Tobacco to be paid to the Lord Proprietary. Wittness theire hands this 24th day of March 1652 John Sturman Testor: Tho. Hatton Richard Sturman
(Wm Stone Esq Govr& Robert p. 413 At a Court held at S Brooke Esq. Capt John Price Maries the 22th day of present Mr Thomas Hatton Mr job March Anno 1652 Chandler M Richard Presto Mr Hugh Lee plt. The plant Sues for fifteen Hundred pounds Henry Potter deft of Tobacco and Caske which he was forced to pay to Mr William Wilby of Virginia in regard of his the plant giveing the defendant a passage from Virga to Maryland upon his Entreaty pretending he was a freeman and proved to be a Servant for reparcon wherein and for Damages the plt. craves releife p at pr petition the defendt in Answer Sayeth that the plt. knew before he gave him his passage upp that he was a Servant, and after he was Come upp did hire him as a Servant and alledged he could prove that the plantiffe knew of his being
|
||||
Volume 10, Page 237 View pdf image (33K) |
Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!
|
An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact
mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.