Volume 10, Page 235 View pdf image (33K) |
Court and Testamentary Business, 1649 50.235
That Court made theire Order thereupon 10 Martij last, upon Liber B. which Clay appealed to the Provinciall Court here, of which appeale the Court at Kent allowed &c. Whereupon this Court proceeded to the hearing of the Cause as followeth viz.
Henry Clay plt The Complt having appealed from the Thomas Ward deft Court at Kent to the Provinciall Court here, after Judgment passed in that Court the first day of this present Month against the defendt for Slanderous words by him Spoken p. 410 concerning the Compltes wife, Expressed in that Order. Upon Consideration now had of the Said Order of that Court and of the Deposition of mr Thomas Ringould one of the Comrs there who now deposed In Court that the defendt Ward upon the passing of that Judgmt did in a Violent way of Expression offer to take his oath in open Court at Kent that the compltes wife had, had the pox or to that Effect, It is thereupon ordered in the presence of both parties plt and Defendant, and upon hearing what could be alledged on either party and proofes produced, That the defendant according to the Judgment of the Court at Kent before Expressed Shall there three Severall Court dayes next after his now return to Kent in open Court there in a Submissive way acknowledge that he hath done the wife of Henry Clay great wrong in the Slanderous and abusive words by him utterred concerning her, Expressed in that order and to aske her forgiveness for the Same with promise never to wrong her Soc againe. And in default of performance therein in a Submissive due respective Manner and at the dayes before Expressed if Just and allowable occasion hind not, the defendant Ward is to pay one thousand pounds of Tobacco and Caske as a fine to the Lord Proprietary, or if Estate of his may not be found Sufficient to Satisfie Such fine he is to be whipped with one and thirty Stripes, at Some Court to be held at Kent Shortly after it is made appeare to the Court there that his Said Estate is not Sufficient for the purpose aforesaid, And that he hath not Satisfied the Said fflne.
Upon the Motion of Thomas Ward Chirurgeon touching Joseph Weeks his unconscionable and Extreame dealing with him (as is alledged) about the delivery of a Servant upon Sale of the Land Menconed in an order of this Court of the 24th of January last made upon the Said Wards Motion, Weeks having taken the Servant upon Execution though Ward tendred other Good Satisfaction in Cattell as is prtended, and Ward having noe Servant at all to assist him in his occasions, have- ing a Charge of wife and Children, and being (as he afledgeth) able to produce a Conveyance whereby It will appeare that
|
||||
Volume 10, Page 235 View pdf image (33K) |
Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!
|
An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact
mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.