Volume 10, Page 106 View pdf image (33K) |
106 Court and Testamentary Business, 1649 50.
Liber B. was content to underwrite the Bill of Sale & received Some goods in part of payment which She left in the hands of the Said Capt Stone untill the return of her Shallop In Wittness whereof I have hereunto Sett my hand this 20th of May 1650 at Providence in the County of Annarundel me Tho: Johnson
The above menconed Thomas Johnson hath made Oath before me James Homewood Magistrate in Providence that what he hath testified above is the truth to the best of his knowledge die ditto James Homewood
P. 229 The Deposition of Elizabeth Parry aged 26 years or there- abouts taken on the of October Sworn and examd Saith That She was present when Mrs Margaret Brent made an absolute bargain with Wm Stone Esqr of a house at St Maries formerly belonging to Leonard Calvert Esq deced & that there was goods at her request delivered unto her in part of pay- ment for the Said house, And that She was present when there was a bill of Sale made for Mrs Brent to Set her hand unto, but She refused to Sett her hand to it, if that it was therein written that She Should be bound to defend him from all Claims, But She would willingly Set her hand to the Bill of Sale if that it was therein written, all Just claims whatsoever, Moreover She heard her Say afterwards that She would not Meddle with the goods aforesd unless the Govr would enter upon the house ffurther this Depont Saith not The mark of E P Eliz Parry J urat coram nosRobt Vaughan Wm Eltonhead.
Wm Stone Esq Complt Upon reading of a former Order of Mrs Margarctt Brent Deft this Court of the 20th of November last made in this Cause It appeared thereby that the hearing of this Cause was by consent on both sides respited till the then next Court, and nothing being then done in the business the Defdt was afterwards arrested upon a warrant to appear in June Court last, and the Complaynant now produceing a Letter under the Defdts hands of the 28th of Aprill last whereby She pretending that her comeing down to Maryland in June would be very Inconvenient earnestly desired the Complt to referr the hearing of the Cause till this Court and then She would not fail to be down, upon which Letter the Complaynt (as he affirmed) was drawn to respite the hearing according to her desire But it appears by another Letter now Shewed under the Defdts hands dated the 10th of July last that She now WaVeS all former proceedings, and preremptory averreth that She
|
||||
Volume 10, Page 106 View pdf image (33K) |
Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!
|
An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact
mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.