clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Judicial and Testamentary Business of the Provincial Court, 1637-1650
Volume 4, Page 335   View pdf image (33K)
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

      

 

              Court and Testamentary Business, 1647.     335

      

        These are to Authowrise Jo: Hollis to take any one cow of Liber A.

       his Lops stocke to satisfy a debt of one cow dew to Tho: Speake

       from his Lopp: ffeb 1 0: 1646: L: Caluert: Concordat cu origi

       nale

        Teste me Rob: Clarke Clk.

      

        In the case betwixt Rob: Holt and Cuthbert Phenick, the

       defendant denieth any such dammage done by him dew.

        the Court fynding a defect    to the sd holt for want of

       Lawfull deliuery of sd Crop the defendent is dismist wthout day

        Will: Edwine denies the to be dew:

        The Court found that the plantife was in the Cowpen when

       the calfe was marked at the markeing of the sd calfe, and

       depended for a satisfaction for it from parties, who had

       promised whereby it appered he consented virtually to the

       marking likewise permitted the defendent to enioy the calfe

       vntill such tyme as the satisfaction he was to haue proued voyd

       in law, wherefore the Court dismist the defendent: and left

       the plantiff to his satisfaction in equity from those who had

       Couenanted it.

      

        In the case of Richard white J. Hollis the defendant denies

       he detaines any such Cow

        The Court haueing appointed three men to vallew the price

       of a Cow and calfe they returned thire verdict 800 l of tobb.

        The Court ordered 800 l for the plantif

      

        Mr Giles Brent apperrd for Mrs Brent at the suit of John p. 92

       Hampton and claymed the priuiiedge of an Administrater.

        ordered that such priuilidg should not be denied him.

      

        Octob 40 Vpon an oath vpon Record whearin Markes

       Phypo assumes that he had satisfyed to Mr Giles Brent one

       thousand pounds of tobacco with caske vpon the accompt of

       Nathaniell Pope Mr Giles Brent, although not knowing of

       hauing rcd the sd satisfaction from markes Phypo yet hauing

       rcd satisfaction for the rest of the tobacco from Mr Pope due

       vpon an order of court vnto him of two thousand pounds of

       tobacco with caske which tobacco was in question betweene

       Marmaduke Snow and Mr Foulke Brent doth acknowledge

       himselfe to haue rcd satisfaction for the sayd two thousand

       from Nathaniell Pope according to the order reseruing vnto

       himselfe right to prosecute for the one thousand against

       Markes Phypo if it shall not appeare to haue bin satisfyed by

       him

                                   Recog: cora' me

                                         Tho:  Greene

      



 
clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Judicial and Testamentary Business of the Provincial Court, 1637-1650
Volume 4, Page 335   View pdf image (33K)   << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  October 06, 2023
Maryland State Archives