Volume 4, Page 160 View pdf image (33K) |
160 Court and Testamentary Business, 1642.
Liber P. R. pressed certaine souldiers & other necessaries for the service by vertue of the said Commission, did discharge them againe of his owne head, & hereby overthrew all the hopes & designes of that expedition, to the great contempt of his Lops authority, the dishonor and danger of the colony, & the ill example of others in the like kind. And for this he impeacheth the said Giles Brent of a misdemeanor & contempt; & prayeth that such proceedings & sentence may be had & vsed against him as to justice shall apperteine. warne Giles Brent gent that he putt in his answere to the Information of his attorny for a contempt & misdemeanor, some time before nine of the clock on monday morning next vpon paine of contempt, & of having iudgemt proceed against him in punishmt of such his contempt. And certifie at or afore the said time what you shall doe herein And this shalbe yor warrant. To the Sheriff S. mar.
5. John Langford Esq demandeth of Edward Hall and Thomas Orly two thousand wt of tobacco with cask due by bill. attachmt in forma consuet retorn 1st febr next.
Eod. John Lewger demandeth of Edward hall two hundred & ninety Wt of tob wth cask due by acct attachmt in forma consuet retorn 1st febr next
p. 63 1642
december the said Giles Brent reserving to himselfe power to reply in fit time to every particular of the mis carriages objected against him in the said bill concerning the omission of the exequution of the said commission, which mis carriages he saith are iniuriously laid to his charge, the said omission having been made (so as it was done) warrantably & vpon good & just grounds; saith for present answere that in the said omission (made so as it was) he hath not committed a contempt & misdemeanor & for triall hereof he putteth him selfe vpon the country. Giles Brent.
Eod. And the said John Lewger saith that the said answere Vacat ista of the said Giles Brent, is not sufficient in Law to responsio preclude him from his said bill, nor to be replied vnto by him, in regard it iustifies the matter charged agst him, & putts the iustification to the triall of the country, wch iusti fication is not a point triable by the country, but determinable only by the Court, wch is to iudge in all causes criminall. And therefore prayeth that iudgemt may be given vpon his bill.
|
||||
Volume 4, Page 160 View pdf image (33K) |
Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!
|
An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact
mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.