Respited from the last Crt when Ordered tht the deft doe
Put in his plea this Crt wch is as followeth
And the sd Jo. Bailey by Benjamin Rozer his Attorney Comes
& defends the force & injurie when &c. and Saith thC the sd
Reymond ought not to have his aeon aforesd agt him because
he saith the Bond alleadged is not his deed
Benjamin Rozer
And the sd Reymond saith as formerly he hath said tht the
Writing is the deed of him the sd Jo. Bailey & of this he Puts
himselfe upon the Countrey And the sd Jo. Likewise Therefore
Ordr is given &c
The defendt in Open Crt Confessed the bond to be his deed
Wherefore Judgmt Passed for the Plaintife
My Robt Ridgeley 12th of March 1673.
Let a Writ of Scire facias issue agt Jo. Bailey at the Suite of
Reymond Stapleford to Shew Cause why Execucon should not
be issued agt. him the sd Bailey for Two Thousand Pounds
sterling for wch the sd Stapleford Obtained Judgmt in the Proll
Crt agt the sd Bailey upon a Bond the 9th of ffebruarie 1668
Charles Calvert
Caecilius &c. to the Sherrife of St Maries Countie Greeting
Whereas at a Proll Court held at the Cittie of St Maries before
the Justices of the sd Crt the 9th day of ffebruarie in the 37th
yeare of or Dominion over or sd Province Annoq dni 1668 in
a Suite depending between Reymond Stapleford Plaintife &
Jo. Bailey defendt the sd Plf recovered agt the sd Bailey defendt
Judgemt for the Sume of 2000ls Sterl & for tht Execucon hath
|