Mary Jane Dowd, msa_sc5330_23_8, Image No: 37   Enlarge and print image (46K)          << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space


 

Mary Jane Dowd, msa_sc5330_23_8, Image No: 37   Enlarge and print image (46K)          << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
THE STATE IN THE MARYLAND ECONOMY, _ 1776-1807 125 limits of Pens will depend. Unless this is permitted the opening undertaken within the limits of Maryland will be of little account. It is luck that both parties are so dependent on each other as to be thus mutually forced into measures of public utility.la8 Maryland, finally agreeing to the project on just such terms as Madison had outlined thirteen years before, in 1799 incorpor- ated The Chesapeake and Delaware Canal Company to make the cut 'BB In most respects the charter was similar to that of the Potomac Company except that the original capital was to be $500,000, any net profits over thirty per cent were to be divid- ed equally between Delaware and Maryland, and there was no provision for Maryland state investment in the company.ls9 The Pennsylvania and Delaware incorporaton acts were not passed until 1801, and it was not until May 1803 that suffi- cient shares had been subscribed to permit the organization of the company. True to their interest, Baltimoreans had not bought a single share of stock in the company although 256 shares were sold elsewhere in the state .170 The Elk River route was decided upon and work began in 1804. By 1805 the com- pany was in serious trouble. No work had been done on the main channel and the shareholders had refused to pay on their subscriptions. The company turned to the chartering states, but not even Pennsylvania seemed to be interested. In vain it petitioned Congress for aid, referring to the canal as the first internal improvement of national interest. The work dragged on until 1829'7' when the whole canal was finished. One of the main reasons for this long delay was the absence of any state assistance (except the incorporation itself) such as the Susquehanna and Potomac projects had received. Two other companies to improve inland navigation which were incorporated in this period were concerned with projects of a local or county interest. One, the Pocomoke Company, incorporated in 1796 to extend the navigation of the Poco- moke River from Snow Hill to the Delaware line, had a capi- tal of $11,000. It was given the right- to raise snore money by 187 Davis, 11, 136. $9 See above. 10. Md. Sess., 1799 c. 16. '°° Out of a possible 2,500 shares. Livingood, p. 87. '711bid., p. 86, Scharf, Maryland, II, 524.