Mary Jane Dowd, msa_sc5330_23_8, Image No: 35   Enlarge and print image (46K)          << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space


 

Mary Jane Dowd, msa_sc5330_23_8, Image No: 35   Enlarge and print image (46K)          << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
THE STATE IN THE MARYLAND ECONOMY, 1776-1807 123 stock.i68 In 1797 the company reported to the General Assem- bly that all the obstructions from the Savage River to tidewa- ter had been removed except those at Great Falls. In order to facilitate transportation of goods over the Great Falls (un- til the locks could be completed), the company had constructed an " inclined plain " (with pulleys) to lift articles over the obstructions. The company petitioned the Assembly, saying that since those using the river reaped great benefit from this, the labors and expenses of the company ought to be recom- pensed by allowing it to collect tolls at Great Falls. This the Assembly granted 167 In 1798 when neither private indivduals nor the two states could be prevailed upon to subscribe for new shares, the com- pany borrowed $6,000 from the Banks of Columbia (in what is now the District of Columbia) and Alexandria, with col- lateral of public debt stock loaned from George Washington and Daniel Carroll. The new tolls granted in 1797 were of great help to the company in constructing the locks at Great Falls.158 By 1799 the Maryland legislature had been persuaded by persistent-lobbyists to aid the company once again by sub- scribing to £13,000 worth of new stock."' Finally with this aid the company was able in 1801 to de- clare the locks at Great Falls complete and the navigation of the Potomac open to full tolls.ie° In 1815 a report on the com- pany to the Virgina House of Delegates stated that about 338 miles of the river had been made navigable at a cost of about $500,000 and that Maryland and Virginia had furnished more than half the capital. Except for one dividend of $5.50 per share in 1802, the toll revenues had been consumed in main- tenance, operating expenses, and futile attempts to complete the navigation system as stipulated by the charter.'" By the 1820's the company was persuaded that no amount of money lse A. Md.' Gax., Nov. 24, 1796, p. 2, and reply of legislature Nov. 31, 1796, p. 2. 157 Md. Se.., 1797 c. 92. "'Davis, 11, 134. lag Md. Sess, 1782 Resolutions. Davis, 11, 135 says that a loan teas grunted to the company the same year but there are no records of it in the financial- state- ments in the Votes and Proceedings of the House of Delegates of Maryland . . . 1777-1807 (Annapolis, by session) in the following years. '°° Davis, 11, 135, Md Sess, 1802 c. 84. '°' Davis, II, 135. . ,