Black & Jenkins Award,1877,
msa_sc_5330_8_12
, Image No.: 26
   Enlarge and print image (47K)          << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space


 

Black & Jenkins Award,1877,
msa_sc_5330_8_12
, Image No.: 26
   Enlarge and print image (47K)          << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
26 ing line of the States; but none of them can give any substantial grounds for his belief. Out of this contradictory evidence and above the ob- scurity of yague tradition there rises one clear and decisive fact, which is this : that for at least forty years last past Maryland has acknowledged the right of Virginia up to a line which, beginning at Sassafras Hammock, runs east- ward across the island to Horse Hammock, and Virginia has claimed no higher. By that line alone both States have limited their occupancy for a time twice as long as the law requires to make title by prescription. By that line Maryland has bounded her election district and her county. North of it all the people vote and pay taxes in Maryland, obey her magistrates, and submit to the pro- cess of her courts. South of it lies, undisturbed and un- disputed, the old dominion of Virginia. We have no doubt whatever that we are bound to regard that as being now the true boundary between the two States. There are not two adjoining farms in all the country whose limits are better settled by an occupancy of forty years, or whose owners have more carefully abstained from all intrusion upon one another within that time. We have thus ascertained to our entire satisfaction the extent and situation of the territory which each State has held long enough to make a title by prescription, and the boundary now to be determined must conform to those possessions, no matter at what expense of change in the original lines. We know, therefore, how the laud is to be divided. But how does prescriptive title to land affect the right of the parties in the adjacent waters ? It has been argued with great force and ingenuity that a title resulting merely from long possession can apply only to the ground which the claimant has had under his feet, together with its proper appurtenances; that a river, a lake, or a bay is land covered with water; that land can- not be appurtenant to land; that therefore title by pre- scription stops at the shore. But this is unsound, because the water in such a case is not claimed as appurtenant to