Black & Jenkins Award,1877,
msa_sc_5330_8_12
, Image No.: 10
   Enlarge and print image (45K)          << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space


 

Black & Jenkins Award,1877,
msa_sc_5330_8_12
, Image No.: 10
   Enlarge and print image (45K)          << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
9 these lines if we can but find out the precise situation of Watkins Point. This point being the commencement and closing place of the boundary is twice named, and once its locality is given with reference to other objects. It is described as lying t1juxta sinw,a predictum prope flumen de Wighco; " that is to say, on (or close to) the aforesaid bay (the Chesapeake) and near the river Wighco. Looking at Smith's map we find a cape extending southwestwardly from the main- land of the eastern shore. This cape is called Watkins Point by Smith himself on his map, and he has marked the waters on one side Chesapeack bay, and on the other Wighco flumen. Turning to the modern maps, and espe- cially to those of the Coast Survey, where everything is measured with fractional accuracy, we find the same point of land laid down, not quite in the same latitude nor de- lineated with exactly the same shape, but bordered by the same waters, and with Do variance which makes its identity at all doubtful. It is at present the extreme southwestern point of Somerset county in Maryland- at Cedar straits, juxta the Chesapeake and prope the Pocomoke, which is now the name for Wighco. Being the Watkins Point of Smith's map it is the Watkins Point of the charter. This conclusion appears to be inevitable from the prem- ises stated; but it does not receive universal assent. We must therefore notice the principal grounds on which its correctness is impugned. In the first place, the fundamental fact is denied that Smith by his own map affixed the name of Watkins Point to the headland in question. In other words, it is alleged that, though the point is laid down and the name written in proximity to it, the one does not apply to the other. Let the map speak for itself. An inspection of it will show that all the names of such points are written in the same way. Nor is there any other point to which it can with reasonable propriety be referred. The map has been uniformly read as we read it. Lord Baltimore showed how he understood it. In 1685, only