Andor D. Skotnes, The Black Freedom Movement and the Worker's Movement in Baltimore, 1930-1939, Rutger's PhD, 1991,
Image No: 451
   Enlarge and print image (62K)            << PREVIOUS   NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space


 

Andor D. Skotnes, The Black Freedom Movement and the Worker's Movement in Baltimore, 1930-1939, Rutger's PhD, 1991,
Image No: 451
   Enlarge and print image (62K)            << PREVIOUS   NEXT >>
451 personnel which had heretofore been represented by the Marine Engineers' Beneficial Association, which was by this time gravitating toward the CIO. The AFL raid resulted in a tugboat strike that tied up the port for two weeks until it was tentatively terminated on October 18 so the two organizations could argue their cases before the NLRB. This strike seems to have set the unlicensed tugboat workers, organized in to I LA Local 1337 into motion around their own demands, and three weeks later a second tugboat strike tied up the port. During the second strike, which lasted a month and resulted in a compromise settlement with shorter working hours, the CIO sat on the sidelines.44 As dramatic as the AFL's "war" on the CIO on the waterfront was on occasion, it really signified very little during 1937. Despite the AFL's active opposition, the NMU grew to overwhelming dominance among the seamen as the ISU, severely damaged by the 100-Days Strike, all but collapsed; additionally, the IUMSWA-CIO initiated its organizing campaign among non-union shipyard workers. The ILA, on the other hand, retained the support of the longshoremen, but made few inroads elsewhere. Perhaps the main benefit of the anti-CIO campaign for the AFL was that it did shored up its hegemony over the longshoremen, many of whom wavered during the 100-Days Strike. There must have been some concern on the part of ILA leaders about the Black longshoremen in particular, for according to the Afro's William N. Jones at mid-year, the longshoremen of Local 858 were loyal to the AFL for the moment, but were apprehensive both over the coming battle with the CIO and over the prospect of a never-ending battle within the AFL over Jim Crow. The NMU was aware of the Black longshoremen's ambivalence and continued its efforts to wean them away from the AFL - a practice that made ILA leaders livid. ^ It is important to note that, despite the overwhelming rejection of the rank- and-file seamen's movement by Black longshoremen in late 1936, and despite continuing solidarity of these workers with the AFL, there was no backlash in the