Andor D. Skotnes, The Black Freedom Movement and the Worker's Movement in Baltimore, 1930-1939, Rutger's PhD, 1991,
Image No: 390
   Enlarge and print image (58K)            << PREVIOUS   NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space


 

Andor D. Skotnes, The Black Freedom Movement and the Worker's Movement in Baltimore, 1930-1939, Rutger's PhD, 1991,
Image No: 390
   Enlarge and print image (58K)            << PREVIOUS   NEXT >>
390 Overall, however, the branch attempted to resolve competing demands and approaches by taking the stance of the ultimate advocate or tribune of the African American community, not only in Baltimore, but in Maryland as a whole. The first legal challenge that was mounted by the renovated Baltimore branch illustrates some of these tensions and their resolutions. In the mid-193Os, Baltimore County had eleven segregated high schools for white children and none for Black children. Those Black children in the county who wanted a high school education and who passed a competency test were sent to a school in the city of Baltimore at county expense. The Black community of Baltimore County objected to this discriminatory situation and petitioned the county board of education in October 1935 for a Black high school; the board refused even to accept the petition. Then, in February 1936,14-year-old Margaret Williams and her father Joshua filed a petition for a writ of mandamus through attorney Thurgood Marshall of the Baltimore NAACP, requesting that Margaret, who had been refused funding to high school in Baltimore City, be admitted to the high school closest to her home, the all-white Catonsville High School. Margaret had successfully completed elementary school and had obtained an elementary certificate, but she had, however, twice failed the competency exam. On October 22,1936 the Williams petition was turned down on the basis that Margaret had failed the exam, even though that exam was not mandated by law and Blacks considered it highly discriminatory (50% of the Black students taking it failed). The judge refused to consider other issues, including the legality of the county's failure to provide directly secondary schooling for Blacks. In April 1937, the appeals court upheld the lower court ruling, and lack of resources prevented further appeals. For the NAACP, the outcome of the case underlined both the difficulty of integrating white public schools and the necessity of overturning the separate by equal dictum.^