Andor D. Skotnes, The Black Freedom Movement and the Worker's Movement in Baltimore, 1930-1939, Rutger's PhD, 1991,
Image No: 389
   Enlarge and print image (59K)            << PREVIOUS   NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space


 

Andor D. Skotnes, The Black Freedom Movement and the Worker's Movement in Baltimore, 1930-1939, Rutger's PhD, 1991,
Image No: 389
   Enlarge and print image (59K)            << PREVIOUS   NEXT >>
389 program, and elected a state-wide leadership, with Baltimore's Enolia Pettigen McMillan as president and LJllie Jackson as first vice-president. And again it bears mentioning: four of six state leaders elected were women. Hence, by the end of the decade, the NAACP in Baltimore and Maryland looked very different from the same organization at mid-decade when, according to Ira De A. Re id there were only 100 members. In one way, though, it changed little: its membership was almost entirely Black. Some whites were involved, but not many. Of the $2,134 collected in dues in the 1935 membership drive, $200 came from whites; at the 1936 national NAACP conference, the Baltimore youth delegation publicly highlighted the fact that it contained a few whites. These, though, were the exceptions that proved the rule, and there is no evidence that white membership for the rest of the decade and well into the 1940s was anything but infinitesimal. The NAACP may have been an integrationalist organization in philosophy, but its Baltimore branch was almost entirely African American in social . . 10 composition/0 • •• What was the program and practice of the renovated Baltimore NAACP? In essence, the branch adopted the strategic perspective and plan proposed by Charles Houston: to "sue Jim Crow out of Baltimore." Indeed, Maryland remained Houston's "legal laboratory" throughout the 1930s and well into the 1940s, even after he left the national NAACP staff. At the same time, the branch adopted much of the traditional agenda of the Baltimore Black freedom movement as it had been promoted by the Afro and other community institutions over the years. There was tension — although not necessarily conflict — between the national perspective and the local agenda, just as there was a tension between litigation and mass organizing as strategic principles. The Baltimore branch worked these tensions out in different ways in the different campaigns and activities that it undertook.