Andor D. Skotnes, The Black Freedom Movement and the Worker's Movement in Baltimore, 1930-1939, Rutger's PhD, 1991,
Image No: 92
   Enlarge and print image (59K)            << PREVIOUS   NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space


 

Andor D. Skotnes, The Black Freedom Movement and the Worker's Movement in Baltimore, 1930-1939, Rutger's PhD, 1991,
Image No: 92
   Enlarge and print image (59K)            << PREVIOUS   NEXT >>
92 probably stronger among the transportation workers than among the manufacturing workers as a whole; these traditions were most powerful in water transport and on 1 *^ the railroads — the oldest industries in this economic sector.IJ As noted above, nearly one-third of Baltimore's employed workers were located outside of the manufacturing and transport sectors of the Baltimore working class ~ outside the industrial proletariat. This might appear to indicate that the shift away from industry toward the "service sector," so typical happened of later capitalist development in U.S. cities, was already well under way in Baltimore in 1930. This, however, was not the really the case. As Table 4-1 suggests, there were three non-industrial sectors of the economy with significant numbers of workers: trade and commerce, clerical, and domestic and personal service. Of these, the workers listed in commerce formed a distinct working class sector only in the weakest sense. While census figures indicate that commercial workers made up 4.5% of the employed working-class population, over 22% of those listed in this category (including the deliverymen and the laborers in industrial and semi-industrial enterprises such as grain elevators, lumber yards, and coal yards) would be more accurately classified as manufacturing and transport workers. The real commercial sector of the working class, therefore, was made up of 6,000 or so clerks, porters, meatcutters, laborers, and the like in retail stores. Despite the presence of some larger retail stores in Baltimore like Hutzler's Department Store and Hothschild Kohn and Company, most of these workers functioned in very small and scattered workplaces, often directly under the supervision of the owners; among these workers the labor movement was all but absent. Hence the commercial sector of the Baltimore working class in the 1930s would appear to have been a very unlikely site for important social struggles. However, the fact that clerks in the commercial sector deal directly with the public in the process of consumption, and the racial dynamics of Baltimore during the