Andor D. Skotnes, The Black Freedom Movement and the Worker's Movement in Baltimore, 1930-1939, Rutger's PhD, 1991,
Image No: 91
   Enlarge and print image (64K)            << PREVIOUS   NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space


 

Andor D. Skotnes, The Black Freedom Movement and the Worker's Movement in Baltimore, 1930-1939, Rutger's PhD, 1991,
Image No: 91
   Enlarge and print image (64K)            << PREVIOUS   NEXT >>
91 of the most technologically advanced industries, and 38.2% were employed in construction, which depended on largely traditional work processes. In the former case, laborers coexisted with large numbers of semi-skilled as well as skilled workers, in the latter case there was virtually no semi-skilled buffer between them and some of the most aristocratic craft workers. Trade-union traditions and organization were even weaker among the laborers than among the operatives, although the laborers in the ranks of construction showed a greater tendency to organize than those in newer, larger industry throughout the years leading up to the Crash.12 Transportation and communication workers who, like manufacturing workers, were a component of the industrial working class, made up only about one-eighth of the workers employed in Baltimore in this period. Despite their relatively small numbers, these workers were among the most "strategically" placed in the Baltimore economy - strategic from the point of view of business, for they were crucial to the movement of goods, people, and information that the industrial port of Baltimore required; strategic from the point of view of the labor movement because of their potential to disrupt the economy with protests. Divided among the categories of water transport, railroad, road and street, and various types of communications, these workers displayed a variety of skill levels and experienced a range of working conditions analogous to those in manufacturing. At the skilled pole there were, for example, the engineers, firemen, and conductors of the national railroads like the Baltimore and Ohio, and the motormen of the street railways; like skilled construction workers, they were an extremely aristocratic and exclusivistic craft group. At the opposite pole were unskilled workers of little status or income, including laborers, porters, and baggagemen (the latter two occupations sharing characteristics of low-status personal service workers). At a more middling level were the sailors, seamen, longshoremen, drivers, teamsters, telegraph and telephone operators. Proportionately speaking, trade-union traditions were