New York Globe report of the Webster Case, 1850,
Image No: 15
   Enlarge and print image (97K)           << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space


 

New York Globe report of the Webster Case, 1850,
Image No: 15
   Enlarge and print image (97K)           << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
15' The surgeons who made the examination said that the wood-cut of these remains given in the papers, is as accurate as.could be made. Question by the Government.-Would it not be requisite in order to cut up the body in the manner as stated in the report, that the person doing it should possess some scientif4 skill ? Answer.-In my opinion it would require considerable scientific skill-the separation of the sternum from the ribs appears to evince some knowledge of anatomy. There was nothing in the remains found that would lead one to suppose that he belonged to a subject for dissection, and not to the body of Dr. P. They were evidently not separated for the purpose of dissection-if they had been, we should have found in the veins and arteries some preserving fluid, such as it is customary to inject into the organs for circulating blood, at the time they are received at the College. Am perfectly satisfied that they are the remains of one and the same body. A block of mineral teeth were handed me by the Coroner; I carried them to my house, and kep) them for the purpose of showing them to Dr. Keep, for the purpose of identification. I rfe a them to Dr. Keep Cross-examined.-Have been acquainted with Dr. Parkman about 30 years; there,Were no marks about Dr. P's body that were peculiar to him; the comparison of one body wA parts of another body as to hight will give the stature almost to a certainty; there wer~two perfora- tions of the parts of the body ; the thorax and left thigh; the flesh of the parts was easily torn, and it was somewhat friable; the usual quantity of blood in a person.ef Dr. P's sizeis about two gallons; there would be about two quarts of blood in the venoiuv'system of a man of his size after death; cannot say how much time it would have taken to consume the parts of the body that were missing by fire, because I have not now in my mind thg fjuantity of fuel the fur- nace would contain ; there was nothing in the appearance of the renAins that would indicate the age of the body with any certainty within 10 years; the parts of this body and the muscles were well developed; I gave the mineral teeth to Dr. Keep; lie retufned them to me, and I .gave them to the Coroner. Direct xesumed.-If a person had received a wound in the region of the heart, he would, in most cases, bleed inwardly. Can't tell how long it would take to burn the parts of the body that were missing, with any certainty-never burned a human head in my life. Cross-examined.- The blood of a person after death is stagnated in the venous system. DR. J. W. STONE, called.-I was present at the examination of the remains found in the Medi- cal College, in the capacity of Secretary; there was a considerable quantity of hair on the back of the body; that on one side was somewhat burned; have known Dr. P. about 6 years; the ap- pearance of the remains was that of those belonging to a person between 60 and 70 years of age; the manner in which the parts were separated would lead one acquainted with anatomy to the conclusion that the person who separated thw,parts was possessed of some anatomical skill; the dissection of the sternum from the breast-bone indicated this more clearly than anything else; there was no appearance in the parts which indicated that they had belonged to a subject for dissection; the body had not been injected as is common with subjects of the dissecting room; if the injection were only arsenical, after a while the appearance of it would be likely to dis- appear; sometimes glue is mixed with it, and then it would not disappear ; these were not in- jected with glue; a po rtion of one of the intestines had the appearance of having been operated on with a knife. Cross-examination.-The flesh of the parts was very soft and easily broken; it was also appa- rent that fire had been applied to it; we looked for a wound in the dhest, but we found none, nor was there any indication on the thorax or chest that it had been penetrated by a knife. DR. GEo. H. GAY, called.-I was one of the committee of surgeons appointed by the Coroner to,examine scientifically the parts of the body found in the Medical College; think that the head was separated from the body by a saw; it would be a difficult thing to separate the head of a person from the body with a knife; don't know whether the hole in the thorax was made by taking it out of the tea-chest or not; I saw a perforation of the membranes between the ribs just after it had been taken out of the chest. Cross-examined.-The hole was about an inch and a half inlength, and was between the sixth , and seventh ribs, but there was no indication that it was done by a knife ; I thought that it was done with a stick when I had first seen it. Direct, resumed.-This observation was made at 3 or 4 o'clock Saturday afternoon. DR. WOODBRIDGE STRONG, called.-I have dissected a good many bodies in my day. I had a pirate given me in warm weather, in the year -,and as I only wanted the bones, I dissected him rapidly, and as there was a'good deal of fat about him, I thought it would be as good a way as any to burn him up; I therefore made a large roaring fire, and kept atwork throwing on piece by piece all night, and by 11 o'clock the next day,'I found I had'not done by a great deal. I consider it a great job to burn up a human body. Pitch pine would be the best thing to do it with. Itis necessary to keep the fire well stirred up during the process, or it will go out. I • have known Dr. Parkman several years. Saw him for the last time on the Friday on which he disappeared, at 12 o'clock, in or near Belknap-street, going toward the Common. I had thcyintention of speak- ing to him, but he turned off still toward the Common before I reached him. I went to the Medical College on the Tuesday succeeding the disappearance of Dr. Parkman. As I did not ex- pect at the time to bear testimony before a Court, I did not take notes of what I saw. When I - saw the remains they were on a board. I observed that they appeared to have been separated t