Steiner, Suffrage, 1895,
Image No.: 27
   Enlarge and print image (73K)           << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space


 

Steiner, Suffrage, 1895,
Image No.: 27
   Enlarge and print image (73K)           << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
28 CI'1'I'/.E\SIIII' AND SUFFRAGE IN MARYLAND. as were those qualified to he county electors in the town of Baltimore. In Annapolis, the Mayor. Recorder, and Aldermen sat as judges; in Baltimore, any three of the Town Commissioners. The two municipalities each sent two delegates; but Baltimore electors had no dual vote, as some Annapolitans had, and, in case the population of Baltimore should so decrease as to be less than one-half the voters of tile smallest county' in the State, foi- seven successive years, it should lose all representation, until it regained such _ - population for seven other successive years. This provision was never put in force. Bribery2 of voters and failure .to take an oath or profess belief in Christianity, were to debar men from holding office. A voter,' if required by three persons, must take such oath as the Convention (night appoint-this to keep Tories from voting. Amendments to this Constitution should not be submitted' to the people, but should pass the Legislature, be published three months before the next election, and then be ratified by the succeeding Legislature, in order to go into effect. . The next year,5a law provided that the Governor and Council should deter- mine validity of Sheriff's elections, and this is the only change noted until the entry into the Federal Union placed Maryland in new relations, and caused tile passage of an Act'' providing that elections for members of Congress should be under the same rules as those for delegates to tile Assembly, save that the judges and clerks of election should take special oaths. Each voter should place on his ticket six names, one from each Congressional district, and the one from each district. having the largest number of votes should be declared elected. In case of a tie vote,' the Governor and Council should decide by lot, as also was the case in regard to ties in the vote for electors. This latter provision, probably never used, still remains on the statute books, and shows that Maryland has not entirely broken from -that Platonic principle, tile choice by lot. Electors should be chosen on tile general ticket by popular" vote, and nothing was said as to the filling of vacancies in their number. Special elections should be held in case of Congressional vacancies. - From 179.5 until 1833 Presidential electors were chosen by district ticket,ya practice Maryland was the last of the States to give lip. Previous to that, several plans were tried. At one time the State was divided into nine (1) Art.. 5. \fc\Ialion, p.469, says a.motion to give Baltimore full county representation, if it attained county population, failed. (2) Arts. 54, 55. (3) Not in original draft. Art. 4.3. vide Laws of 1777, ch. 20, "An Act to punish crimes and misdemeanors and prevent the growth of Toryism," passed to enforce this. Repealed 1786, ch.14. (4) Matters relating to privileges of the Eastern Shore required a two-thirds vote of the Legislature to amend ; in other cases a majority was sufficient. Art. 59 (5) Statute of 17 7 7, ch. aIx. (6) Statute of 1788. ch. 7C ; Statute of 1790, ch. NVI, provided that M. C.'s should be chosen on the first Monday in October. Statute of 179'2, ch. V, fixed the election for Presidential electors on the second Wednesday in November. - Statute of 1852, ch. 1.11, changedthe date of Congressional elections tofirst Wednesday in November in odd years, unless the President summon Congress earlier, when the Governor should give twenty days' notice of electibn. (7 ) Changed by 1815, ch. 121. ~8) Stanwood. •• Presidential Elections," p. 11, says that. only three States at first chose electors by popular vote. 3laryland, Pennsylvania and Virginia. (9) Statute of 1795, ch. LSIIII.