Venona
and the Russian Files |
The
fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989 and the rise in the early
1990s of non-Communist governments in Russia and Eastern Europe
has held out the bright promise that, as the Cold War fades
into memory, countries on both sides of the old Iron Curtain
might begin to open their Cold War-era files. Release of long-secret
information, many have hoped, could illuminate or resolve
still- controversial issues, such as the Hiss case.
Unfortunately,
more than a decade later, at the dawn of the 21st Century,
that promise remains, for the most part, only a promise: Full
archival openness - both in Russia and the U.S. - continues
to be a goal rather than a reality. Some information has been
declassified, leading to a rush of recent books, some scholarly,
some popular and dramatic, about Cold War disputes. Many government
archives, however, after offering only glimpses into their
contents, have again been re-sealed.
Some
scholars have already concluded that it may take another generation
or more before historians have anything close to free access
to the full range of Soviet, American, and other Cold War
files. The situation is unlikely to improve without sustained
public pressure in both the U.S. and Europe. (Click
here for information about how you can help move this
process forward.)
What
is the present state of Cold War scholarship? How much has
been learned, and how much remains murky? In particular, what,
if anything, has been discovered about Alger Hiss or Whittaker
Chambers or the Hiss case? In the early 1990s, Alger Hiss,
who in the 1970s had with partial success sued the U.S. government
under the Freedom of Information Act for access to FBI and
State Department files about his case, himself pressed the
post-Communist Russian authorities to release any information
they might have that would shed light on his situation.
Frustratingly, in both Russia and the U.S. only small amounts
of previously unknown information that may relate to Alger
Hiss - some of it tantalizing or ambiguous - have at this
point been made public. Several senior Russian officials or
former officials have, for instance, prepared statements or
issued written comments. The U.S. National Security Agency
has released two World War II-era cables that it thinks may
refer to Alger Hiss. The few scraps of newly available information
continue to be hotly debated. According to Hiss detractors,
the case against Hiss has been considerably tightened; they
suggest that it can now be shown that Hiss continued spying
for the Russians throughout World War II, years after Whittaker
Chambers had turned against the Communist Party. For others,
there are now new reasons for believing in Alger Hiss's innocence.
The search for the truth continues.
Interpreting
the Venona Documents and Information From the Russian Files.
- At
the height of the Cold War, the National Security Agency
decoded Soviet intelligence messages transmitted by telegraphic
cable to and from Moscow during World War II. Those who
for years have supported Whittaker Chambers' charges think
that one of the recently-released Venona cables proves Hiss
was indeed a Soviet spy code-named "ALES." Hiss
Case student, filmmaker, and former law professor John Lowenthal
examines this charge in light of what else is known about
the Hiss case. Click here
to read Lowenthal's article, which appeared in Intelligence
and National Security, a British scholarly quarterly.
- Some
Venona analysts say the Venona transcripts indicate that
Alger Hiss as "Ales" received a commendation for
his espionage from the Soviet Union while visiting Moscow
during the Yalta conference. After examining Hiss's schedule
during the conference, historian Bruce
Craig writes that the charges against Hiss are unfounded.
- Victor
Navasky offers a critical analysis of both the Venona releases
and alleged Noel Field statements about Alger Hiss. Click
here to read Navasky's article from The Nation.
- Miriam
and Walter Schneir explain the history behind the Venona
files. Click here for
their account.
Russians
Say Hiss Was Not a Soviet Spy
In
1991, with the collapse of the Soviet Union and the possibility
that the new, post-Communist Russian regime might open up
some of the Soviet intelligence files, former President Richard
M. Nixon and the director of his presidential library, John
H. Taylor, both wrote to the Russian historian General Dimitry
Antonovich Volkogonov, who had become President Yeltsin's
military advisor and the overseer of all the Soviet intelligence
archives, to request the release of any Soviet files on the
Hiss case. Nixon's and Taylor's letters to Volkogonov have
not been made available to researchers.
In
1992, Alger Hiss made a similar request to Volkogonov, and
also sent identical letters to several other Russian officials.
In response to Hissıs request, Russian archivists and researchers
reviewed their files, and in the fall of 1992 reported back
- by letter, fax, or orally - that they had found no evidence
that Alger Hiss had ever been a member of the Communist Party
USA; and, similarly, that they had found no evidence that
he had ever been an agent for the KGB, for the GRU (Soviet
military intelligence), or for any other intelligence agency
of the Soviet Union.
Such
letters and reports came from:
- the Archive of the Government of the Russian Federation
(Roskomarchiv);
- the Russian Foreign Intelligence Service (successor
agency to the KGB);
- the Russian Ministry of Security;
- the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs;
- the Russian Center for the for the Preservation and
Study of Documents of Modern History (which houses former
Central Party and Comintern archives);
- the Russian Ministry of Defense and Soviet Army Archives
(successor agency to the GRU).
To
read General Volkogonov's October 14, 1992 written report
about Alger Hiss, click here.
To
read a previously unpublished interview with Volkogonov about
Hiss, conducted in Washington, D.C. by John Lowenthal on November
11, 1992, after the written report had been issued click
here.
Several
high-ranking KGB veterans, including General Oleg Kalugin,
a former chief of the foreign intelligence department, have
also stated that Alger Hiss was not a Soviet spy. The published
memoirs, excerpted here, of General-Lieutenant
Vitaly Pavlov, who oversaw Soviet intelligence work
in North America in the late 1930s and early 1940s, include
comments about both Hiss and Harry Hopkins, one of President
Roosevelt's principal advisors.
The
State of Cold War Scholarship
-
Journalist Eric
Alterman examines the level of scholarship of those who
say that Soviet files corroborate the espionage charges
leveled in the 1940s against Alger Hiss and others. Click
here to read his article from The Nation.
- In
his appraisal of "The Secret World of American
Communism," journalist and Hiss case expert
William A. Reuben disputes claims that Soviet spies permeated
the American Communist Party. Click
here to read his review from Rights magazine.
- Canadian
Cold War historian, Amy Knight, argues that the new literature
on Soviet espionage is often less revealing than it appears.
Click here to read her
article.
Venona
and the FBI: A Look at the Originals
- To
see the Venona document that refers to "ALES,"
click here.
- To
see the Venona document that refers to a State Department
official "by the name of Hiss," click
here.
- To
see a 1950 FBI report about Venona that may have been the
origin of the FBI's tentative identification of Alger Hiss
as "ALES," click here.
- Was
the FBI convinced that Alger Hiss was "ALES"?
To see a 1953 FBI investigative report indicating that the
Bureau was still searching for evidence, click
here. (This document was released to Alger Hiss
in the 1970s but did not make sense to researchers until
after the public release of the Venona papers.)
Back
to the Courtroom
|