|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 Vetoed Bills and Messages
|
|
|
|
|
|
H.B. 337
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SECTION 1. BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF
MARYLAND, That the Laws of Maryland read as follows:
Article - Criminal Procedure
5-214.
(A) THIS SECTION APPLIES ONLY IN CECIL COUNTY.
(B) VIDEO CONFERENCING PROCEDURES AND TECHNOLOGY MAY BE
USED TO FACILITATE THE PRETRIAL RELEASE PROCESS AFTER
NOTWITHSTANDING MARYLAND RULE 4-217(G), AFTER A DEFENDANT HAS
APPEARED IN PERSON BEFORE THE COMMISSIONER OR JUDGE IN A CASE, THE
DEFENDANT MAY POST BOND BY MEANS OF ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION OR
HAND DELIVERY OF THE RELEVANT DOCUMENTATION WITHOUT APPEARING
BEFORE THE COMMISSIONER OR JUDGE, IF AUTHORIZED BY:
(1) IN THE CIRCUIT COURT, THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE
JUDGE; AND
(2) IN THE DISTRICT COUNT COURT, THE DISTRICT
ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE CHIEF JUDGE OF THE DISTRICT COURT.
(C) IMMEDIATELY AFTER A PROCEEDING CONDUCTED THROUGH VIDEO
CONFERENCING, ALL DOCUMENTS THAT ARE NOT A PART OF THE COURT FILE
AND THAT WOULD BE A PART OF THE FILE IF THE PROCEEDING HAD BEEN
CONDUCTED AT THE COURT SHALL BE ELECTRONICALLY TRANSMITTED OR
HAND DELIVERED TO THE APPROPRIATE COURT.
SECTION 2. AND BE IT FURTHER ENACTED, That this Act shall take effect
October 1, 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 17, 2007
The Honorable Michael E. Busch
Speaker of the House
State House
Annapolis, MD 21401
Dear Mr. Speaker:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- 4680 -
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
