clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e
  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search search for:
clear space
white space
Session Laws, 2004
Volume 801, Page 2734   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

S.B. 269

VETOES

(3) IF THE COURT OF THE STATE HAVING JURISDICTION
SUBSTANTIALLY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS TITLE DOES NOT DETERMINE THAT
THE COURT OF THIS STATE IS A MORE APPROPRIATE FORUM, THE COURT OF THIS
STATE SHALL DISMISS THE PROCEEDING.

(C) (1) IN A PROCEEDING TO MODIFY A CHILD CUSTODY DETERMINATION, A
COURT OF THIS STATE SHALL DETERMINE WHETHER A PROCEEDING TO ENFORCE
THE DETERMINATION HAS BEEN COMMENCED IN ANOTHER STATE.

(2) IF A PROCEEDING TO ENFORCE A CHILD CUSTODY DETERMINATION
HAS BEEN COMMENCED IN ANOTHER STATE, THE COURT MAY:

(I)      STAY THE PROCEEDING FOR MODIFICATION PENDING THE
ENTRY OF AN ORDER OF A COURT OF THE OTHER STATE ENFORCING, STAYING,
DENYING, OR DISMISSING THE PROCEEDING FOR ENFORCEMENT;

(II)     ENJOIN THE PARTIES FROM CONTINUING WITH THE
PROCEEDING FOR ENFORCEMENT; OR

(III)   PROCEED WITH THE MODIFICATION UNDER CONDITIONS IT
CONSIDERS APPROPRIATE.

9.5-207.

(A)     (1) A COURT OF THIS STATE THAT HAS JURISDICTION UNDER THIS TITLE
TO MAKE A CHILD CUSTODY DETERMINATION MAY DECLINE TO EXERCISE ITS
JURISDICTION AT ANY TIME IF IT DETERMINES THAT IT IS AN INCONVENIENT
FORUM UNDER THE CIRCUMSTANCES AND THAT A COURT OF ANOTHER STATE IS A
MORE APPROPRIATE FORUM.

(2) THE ISSUE OF INCONVENIENT FORUM MAY BE RAISED UPON
MOTION OF A PARTY, THE COURT'S OWN MOTION, OR REQUEST OF ANOTHER COURT.

(B)     (1) BEFORE DETERMINING WHETHER IT IS AN INCONVENIENT FORUM, A
COURT OF THIS STATE SHALL CONSIDER WHETHER IT IS APPROPRIATE FOR A COURT
OF ANOTHER STATE TO EXERCISE JURISDICTION.

(2) FOR THE PURPOSE UNDER PARAGRAPH (1) OF THIS SUBSECTION,
THE COURT SHALL ALLOW THE PARTIES TO SUBMIT INFORMATION AND SHALL
CONSIDER ALL RELEVANT FACTORS, INCLUDING:

(I)      WHETHER DOMESTIC VIOLENCE HAS OCCURRED AND IS
LIKELY TO CONTINUE IN THE FUTURE AND WHICH STATE COULD BEST PROTECT THE
PARTIES AND THE CHILD;

(II)     THE LENGTH OF TIME THE CHILD HAS RESIDED OUTSIDE THIS
STATE;

(III)   THE DISTANCE BETWEEN THE COURT IN THIS STATE AND THE
COURT IN THE STATE THAT WOULD ASSUME JURISDICTION;

(IV)    THE RELATIVE FINANCIAL CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE PARTIES;

- 2734 -

 

clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Session Laws, 2004
Volume 801, Page 2734   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  October 11, 2023
Maryland State Archives