Volume 801, Page 2734 View pdf image |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
S.B. 269 VETOES (3) IF THE COURT OF THE STATE HAVING JURISDICTION (C) (1) IN A PROCEEDING TO MODIFY A CHILD CUSTODY DETERMINATION, A (2) IF A PROCEEDING TO ENFORCE A CHILD CUSTODY DETERMINATION (I) STAY THE PROCEEDING FOR MODIFICATION PENDING THE (II) ENJOIN THE PARTIES FROM CONTINUING WITH THE (III) PROCEED WITH THE MODIFICATION UNDER CONDITIONS IT 9.5-207. (A) (1) A COURT OF THIS STATE THAT HAS JURISDICTION UNDER THIS TITLE (2) THE ISSUE OF INCONVENIENT FORUM MAY BE RAISED UPON (B) (1) BEFORE DETERMINING WHETHER IT IS AN INCONVENIENT FORUM, A (2) FOR THE PURPOSE UNDER PARAGRAPH (1) OF THIS SUBSECTION, (I) WHETHER DOMESTIC VIOLENCE HAS OCCURRED AND IS (II) THE LENGTH OF TIME THE CHILD HAS RESIDED OUTSIDE THIS (III) THE DISTANCE BETWEEN THE COURT IN THIS STATE AND THE (IV) THE RELATIVE FINANCIAL CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE PARTIES; - 2734 -
|
![]() | |||
![]() | ||||
![]() |
Volume 801, Page 2734 View pdf image |
Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!
|
An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact
mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.