clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e
  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search search for:
clear space
white space
Session Laws, 2004
Volume 801, Page 2365   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

ROBERT L. EHRLICH, JR., Governor                             Ch. 502

(5)     WHETHER RELIEF IN ADDITION TO THE IMMEDIATE PHYSICAL
CUSTODY OF THE CHILD AND ATTORNEYS FEES IS SOUGHT, INCLUDING A REQUEST
FOR ASSISTANCE FROM LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICIALS AND, IF SO, THE RELIEF
SOUGHT; AND

(6)      IF THE CHILD CUSTODY DETERMINATION HAS BEEN REGISTERED
AND CONFIRMED UNDER § 9.5-305 OF THIS SUBTITLE, THE DATE AND PLACE OF
REGISTRATION.

(C)     (1) ON THE FILING OF A PETITION, THE COURT SHALL ISSUE AN ORDER
DIRECTING THE RESPONDENT TO APPEAR IN PERSON WITH OR WITHOUT THE CHILD
AT A HEARING AND MAY ENTER ANY ORDER NECESSARY TO ENSURE THE SAFETY OF
THE PARTIES AND THE CHILD.

(2) (I) THE HEARING SHALL BE HELD ON THE NEXT JUDICIAL DAY
AFTER SERVICE OF THE ORDER UNLESS THAT DATE IS IMPOSSIBLE.

(II)     IN THAT EVENT, THE COURT SHALL HOLD THE HEARING ON
THE FIRST JUDICIAL DAY POSSIBLE.

(III)   THE COURT MAY EXTEND THE DATE OF HEARING AT THE
REQUEST OF THE PETITIONER

(D)     AN ORDER ISSUED UNDER SUBSECTION (C) OF THIS SECTION SHALL
STATE THE TIME AND PLACE OF THE HEARING AND ADVISE THE RESPONDENT THAT
AT THE HEARING THE COURT WILL ORDER THAT THE PETITIONER MAY TAKE
IMMEDIATE PHYSICAL CUSTODY OF THE CHILD AND THE PAYMENT OF FEES, COSTS,
AND EXPENSES UNDER § 9.5-312 OF THIS SUBTITLE, AND MAY SCHEDULE A HEARING
TO DETERMINE WHETHER FURTHER RELIEF IS APPROPRIATE, UNLESS THE
RESPONDENT APPEARS AND ESTABLISHES THAT:

(1)      THE CHILD CUSTODY DETERMINATION HAS NOT BEEN REGISTERED
AND CONFIRMED UNDER § 9.5-305 OF THIS SUBTITLE AND THAT:

(I)      THE ISSUING COURT DID NOT HAVE JURISDICTION UNDER
SUBTITLE 2 OF THIS TITLE;

(II)     THE CHILD CUSTODY DETERMINATION FOR WHICH
ENFORCEMENT IS SOUGHT HAS BEEN VACATED, STAYED, OR MODIFIED BY A COURT
HAVING JURISDICTION TO DO SO UNDER SUBTITLE 2 OF THIS TITLE; OR

(III)   THE RESPONDENT WAS ENTITLED TO NOTICE, BUT NOTICE
WAS NOT GIVEN IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE STANDARDS OF § 9.5-107 OF THIS TITLE,
IN THE PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE COURT THAT ISSUED THE ORDER FOR WHICH
ENFORCEMENT IS SOUGHT; OR

(2)      THE CHILD CUSTODY DETERMINATION FOR WHICH ENFORCEMENT
IS SOUGHT WAS REGISTERED AND CONFIRMED UNDER § 9.5-305 OF THIS SUBTITLE,
BUT HAS BEEN VACATED, STAYED, OR MODIFIED BY A COURT OF A STATE HAVING
JURISDICTION TO DO SO UNDER SUBTITLE 2 OF THIS TITLE.

- 2365 -

 

clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Session Laws, 2004
Volume 801, Page 2365   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  October 11, 2023
Maryland State Archives