clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e
  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search search for:
clear space
white space
Session Laws, 2004
Volume 801, Page 1131   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

ROBERT L. EHRLICH, JR., Governor                             Ch. 304

(iv) the length of time the child has resided with the current
caregiver;

(v) the potential emotional, developmental, and educational harm
to the child if moved from the child's current placement; and

(vi) the potential harm to the child by remaining in State custody
for an excessive period of time.

(2)     To the extent consistent with the best interests of the child in an
out-of-home placement, the local department shall consider the following
permanency plans, in descending order of priority:

(i) returning the child to the child's parent or guardian, unless the
department is the guardian;

(ii) placing the child with relatives to whom adoption,
guardianship, or care and custody, in descending order of priority, are planned to be
granted;

(iii) adoption in the following descending order of priority:

1.       by a current foster parent with whom the child has resided
continually for at least the 12 months prior to developing the permanency plan or for
a sufficient length of time to have established positive relationships and family ties;
or

2.       by another approved adoptive family;

(iv) placing the child in a court approved permanent foster home
with a specific caregiver;

(v) an independent living arrangement; or

(vi) long-term foster care.

(3)      SUBJECT TO PARAGRAPHS (1) AND (2) OF THIS SUBSECTION AND TO
THE EXTENT CONSISTENT WITH THE BEST INTERESTS OF A CHILD IN AN
OUT-OF-HOME PLACEMENT, IN DETERMINING A PERMANENCY PLAN, THE LOCAL
DEPARTMENT SHALL CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING IN DESCENDING ORDER OF
PRIORITY:

(I)      PLACEMENT OF THE CHILD IN THE LOCAL JURISDICTION
WHERE THE CHILD'S PARENT OR GUARDIAN RESIDES; OR

(II)     IF THE LOCAL DEPARTMENT FINDS, BASED ON A COMPELLING
REASON, THAT PLACEMENT OF THE CHILD AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM (I) OF THIS
PARAGRAPH IS NOT IN THE BEST INTEREST OF THE CHILD, PLACEMENT OF THE
CHILD IN ANOTHER JURISDICTION IN THE STATE AFTER CONSIDERING:

1. THE NUMBER OF OTHER CHILDREN IN OUT OF HOME
PLACEMENTS IN PROXIMITY TO THE CURRENT OR PROPOSED OUT OF HOME
PLACEMENT;

- 1131 -

 

clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Session Laws, 2004
Volume 801, Page 1131   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  October 11, 2023
Maryland State Archives