clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e
  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search search for:
clear space
white space
Session Laws, 2002
Volume 800, Page 4471   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space
PARRIS N. GLENDENING, Governor S.B. 247
(4) Water quality impacts associated with runoff from the new
impervious surfaces can be and have been minimized through site design
considerations or use of best management practices approved by the local jurisdiction
to improve water quality; and (5) The property owner performs on-site mitigation as required by the
local jurisdiction to offset potential adverse water quality impacts from the new
impervious surfaces, or the property owner pays a fee to the local jurisdiction in lieu
of performing the on-site mitigation. (g) All fees collected by a local jurisdiction under subsection (f)(5) of this
section must be used to fund projects that improve water quality within the critical
area consistent with the jurisdiction's local Critical Area Protection Program. (h) A local jurisdiction may grant a variance from the provisions of this section
in accordance with regulations adopted by the Commission concerning variances as
part of local program development set forth in COMAR 27.01.11 and notification of
project applications set forth in COMAR 27.03.01. 8-1808.8. (A) EACH LOCAL JURISDICTION IN THE ATLANTIC COASTAL BAYS CRITICAL
AREA SHALL INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING ELEMENTS IN THE JURI
SDICTION'S LOCAL
CRITICAL AREA PROTECTION PROGRAM:
(1) A PROVISION REQUIRING THE USE OF BIORETENTION AND OTHER NONSTRUCTURAL STORMWATER BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES FOR REDEVELOPMENT IN INTENSELY DEVELOPED AREAS WHERE THE COST OF
REDEVELOPMENT EXCEEDS 50% OF THE A
SSESSED VALUE OF THE PROPERTY,
UNLESS THE APPLICANT FOR PROJECT APPROVAL DEMONSTRATE
S THAT USE OF
SUCH MEASURES IS NOT FEASIBLE; (1) AS PART OF COMPLIANCE WITH THE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT
REQUIREMENT
S OF TITLE 27 OF THE CODE OF MARYLAND REGULATIONS AND TITLE
1, SUBTITLE 3 OF THE ENVIRONMENT ARTICLE, A PROVISION ENCOURAGING THE
USE OF BIORETENTION FOR REDEVELOPMENT IN INTENSELY DEVELOPED AREAS
; (2) A PROVISION REQUIRING AN APPLICANT FOR PROJECT APPROVAL
WHO IS NOT SUBJECT TO THE PROVISIONS OF ITEM (1) OF THIS SUBSECTION OR WHO
DEMONSTRATES THAT USE OF THE MEASURES SPECIFIED IN ITEM (1) OF THIS
SECTION ARE NOT FEASIBLE SHALL COMPLY WITH THE STORMWATER
MANAGEMENT PROVISIONS OF TITLE 37 OF THE CODE OF MARYLAND REGULATIONS
AND TITLE 4, SUBTITLE 2 OF THE ENVIRONMENT ARTICLE
; (3) (2) (A) EXCEPT AS PROVIDED IN SUBSECTION (B)(2) OF THIS
SECTION. EACH LOCAL JURISDICTION IN THE ATLANTIC COASTAL BAYS CRITICAL
AREA SHALL INCLUDE IN ITS LOCAL CRITICAL AREA PROTECTION PROGRAM
PROVISIONS REQUIRING PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT SITES IN INTENSELY
DEVELOPED AREAS TO PROVIDE A FOREST OR DEVELOPED WOODLAND COVER OF AT
- 4471 -


 
clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Session Laws, 2002
Volume 800, Page 4471   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact msa.helpdesk@maryland.gov.

©Copyright  October 11, 2023
Maryland State Archives