clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e
  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search search for:
clear space
white space
Session Laws, 2002
Volume 800, Page 271   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space
PARRIS N. GLENDENING, Governor Ch. 26
(II) IS OF A SPECIFIC INSTANCE OF SEXUAL ACTIVITY SHOWING
THE SOURCE OR ORIGIN OF SEMEN, PREGNANCY, DISEASE, OR TRAUMA; (III) SUPPORTS A CLAIM THAT THE VICTIM HAS AN ULTERIOR
MOTIVE TO ACCUSE THE DEFENDANT OF THE CRIME; OR (IV) IS OFFERED FOR IMPEACHMENT AFTER THE PROSECUTOR HAS
PUT THE VICTIM'S PRIOR SEXUAL CONDUCT IN ISSUE. (C) CLOSED HEARING. (1) EVIDENCE DESCRIBED IN SUBSECTION (A) OR (B) OF THIS SECTION
MAY NOT BE REFERRED TO IN A STATEMENT TO A JURY OR INTRODUCED IN A TRIAL
UNLESS THE COURT HAS FIRST HELD A CLOSED HEARING UNDER PARAGRAPH (2) OF
THIS SUBSECTION AND DETERMINED THAT THE EVIDENCE IS ADMISSIBLE. (2) THE COURT MAY RECONSIDER A RULING EXCLUDING THE EVIDENCE
AND HOLD AN ADDITIONAL CLOSED HEARING IF NEW INFORMATION IS DISCOVERED
DURING THE COURSE OF THE TRIAL THAT MAY MAKE THE EVIDENCE ADMISSIBLE. REVISOR'S NOTE: This section is new language derived without substantive
change from former Art. 27, § 461A. In subsection (a) of this section, the former reference to "commission" of a
crime is deleted as implicit in the references to specific crimes. In subsection (b) of this section, the reference to "in a prosecution for rape,
a sexual offense in the first or second degree, attempted rape, or an
attempted sexual offense in the first or second degree" is added for clarity. In subsection (c)(1) and (2) of this section, the references to a "closed"
hearing are substituted for the former archaic references to an "in camera"
hearing. In subsection (c)(2) of this section, the reference to "reconsider[ing] a ruling
excluding evidence and holding] an additional closed hearing" is
substituted for the former reference to "ordering] an in camera hearing"
for clarity and accuracy. The Criminal Law Article Review Committee notes, for the consideration
of the General Assembly, that in subsection (b)(2) of this section, the
separate requirement for "material" evidence may be obsolete in light of
the requirement for "relevant" evidence. See, e.g., Md. Rule 5-401. 3-318. SAME — JURY INSTRUCTIONS. IN A CRIMINAL PROSECUTION UNDER §§ 3-303 THROUGH 3-313 OF THIS
SUBTITLE, A JUDGE MAY NOT INSTRUCT THE JURY: (1) TO EXAMINE THE TESTIMONY OF THE PROSECUTING WITNESS WITH
CAUTION, SOLELY BECAUSE OF THE NATURE OF THE CHARGE;
- 271 -


 
clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Session Laws, 2002
Volume 800, Page 271   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact msa.helpdesk@maryland.gov.

©Copyright  November 18, 2025
Maryland State Archives