clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e
  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search search for:
clear space
white space
Session Laws, 2003
Volume 799, Page 2915   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

ROBERT L. EHRLICH, JR., Governor                             Ch. 419

(ii) the court determines from the testimony of at least 2 physicians
who are competent in psychiatry that the insanity is incurable and there is no hope of
recovery; and

(iii) 1 of the parties has been a resident of this State for at least 2
years before the filing of the application for divorce;

(7)     cruelty of treatment toward the complaining party OR A MINOR
CHILD OF THE COMPLAINING PARTY, if there is no reasonable expectation of
reconciliation; or

(8)     excessively vicious conduct toward the complaining party OR A
MINOR CHILD OF THE COMPLAINING PARTY, if there is no reasonable expectation of
reconciliation.

(b)     Recrimination is not a bar to either party obtaining an absolute divorce on
the grounds set forth in subsection (a)(1) through [(5)] (8) of this section, but is a
factor to be considered by the court in a case involving the ground of adultery.

(c)     Res judicata with respect to another ground under this section is not a bar
to either party obtaining an absolute divorce on the ground of 2-year separation.

(d)     Condonation is not an absolute bar to a decree of an absolute divorce on the
ground of adultery, but is a factor to be considered by the court in determining
whether the divorce should be decreed.

(e)     (1) A court may decree an absolute divorce even if a party has obtained a
limited divorce.

(2) If a party obtained a limited divorce on the ground of desertion that
at the time of the decree did not meet the requirements of subsection (a)(2) of this
section, the party may obtain an absolute divorce on the ground of desertion when the
desertion meets the requirements of subsection (a)(2) of this section.

(F) UNLESS THE COURT AFFIRMATIVELY DETERMINES THAT IT IS IN THE
BEST INTEREST OF A MINOR CHILD, THE CHILD MAY NOT BE COMPELLED TO TESTIFY
IN A PROCEEDING FOR ABSOLUTE DIVORCE ON THE GROUNDS OF CRUELTY OF
TREATMENT TOWARD THE CHILD OR EXCESSIVELY VICIOUS CONDUCT TOWARD THE

CHILD.

SECTION 2. AND BE IT FURTHER ENACTED, That this Act shall take effect
October 1, 2003.

Approved May 22, 2003.

- 2915 -

 

clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Session Laws, 2003
Volume 799, Page 2915   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  October 11, 2023
Maryland State Archives