clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e
  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search search for:
clear space
white space
Session Laws, 2003
Volume 799, Page 1185   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

ROBERT L. EHRLICH, JR., Governor

Ch. 81

30-210.1.

(A)     IN THIS SECTION, "COVERED INDIVIDUAL" MEANS AN EMPLOYEE OF AN
EMPLOYING INSTITUTION WITH DISCRETIONARY AUTHORITY OVER THE
MANAGEMENT OR ADMINISTRATION OF ANY OF THE SUPPLEMENTAL RETIREMENT
PLANS OR THE MANAGEMENT OR DISPOSITION OF THE ASSETS OF ANY OF THE
SUPPLEMENTAL RETIREMENT PLANS.

(B)     SUBJECT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THIS SECTION, THE STATE SHALL
INDEMNIFY A COVERED INDIVIDUAL WHO IS, OR IS THREATENED TO BE MADE, A
PARTY TO AN ACTION OR PROCEEDING, INCLUDING AN ADMINISTRATIVE OR
INVESTIGATIVE PROCEEDING, BY REASON OF THE COVERED INDIVIDUAL'S SERVICE
AS AN EMPLOYEE OF AN EMPLOYING INSTITUTION WITH DISCRETIONARY
AUTHORITY OVER THE MANAGEMENT OR ADMINISTRATION OF ANY OF THE
SUPPLEMENTAL RETIREMENT PLANS OR THE MANAGEMENT OR DISPOSITION OF
THE ASSETS OF ANY OF THE SUPPLEMENTAL RETIREMENT PLANS.

(C)     (1) IN THIS SUBSECTION, "EXPENSES" INCLUDE:

(I)      REASONABLE ATTORNEY'S FEES;

(II)     JUDGMENTS;

(III)   FINES; AND

(IV)    OTHER EXPENSES THAT WERE ACTUALLY AND REASONABLY
INCURRED BY THE INDIVIDUAL IN CONNECTION WITH THE ACTION OR PROCEEDING.

(2)      WITH RESPECT TO A CIVIL, ADMINISTRATIVE, OR INVESTIGATIVE
ACTION OR PROCEEDING, THE STATE SHALL INDEMNIFY A COVERED INDIVIDUAL
FOR THE EXPENSES OF THE ACTION OR PROCEEDING IF THE COVERED INDIVIDUAL
ACTED:

(I)      IN GOOD FAITH; AND

(II)     IN A MANNER THE COVERED INDIVIDUAL REASONABLY
BELIEVED TO BE IN OR NOT OPPOSED TO THE BEST INTEREST OF THE
SUPPLEMENTAL RETIREMENT PLANS.

(3)      WITH RESPECT TO A CRIMINAL ACTION OR PROCEEDING, THE STATE
SHALL INDEMNIFY A COVERED INDIVIDUAL FOR THE EXPENSES OF THE ACTION OR
PROCEEDING IF THE COVERED INDIVIDUAL:

(I)      ACTED IN GOOD FAITH;

(II)     ACTED IN A MANNER THE COVERED INDIVIDUAL REASONABLY
BELIEVED TO BE IN OR NOT OPPOSED TO THE BEST INTEREST OF THE
SUPPLEMENTAL RETIREMENT PLANS; AND

(III)   DID NOT HAVE REASONABLE CAUSE TO BELIEVE THAT THE
COVERED INDIVIDUAL'S CONDUCT WAS UNLAWFUL.

- 1185 -

 

clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Session Laws, 2003
Volume 799, Page 1185   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  August 17, 2024
Maryland State Archives