clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e
  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search search for:
clear space
white space
Session Laws, 2003
Volume 799, Page 1091   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

ROBERT L. EHRLICH, JR., Governor                               Ch. 49

agency to which the child is committed has documented a compelling reason for
determining that it would not be in the best interest of the child to:

(1)     Return home;

(2)     Be referred for termination of parental rights; or

(3)     Be placed for adoption or guardianship with a specified and
appropriate relative or legal guardian willing to care for the child.

(g) In the case of a child for whom the court determines that the plan should
be changed to adoption under subsection (e)(1)(iii) of this section, the court shall:

(1)     Order the local department to file a petition for guardianship in
accordance with Title 5, Subtitle 3 of the Family Law Article within 30 days or, if the
local department does not support the plan, within 60 days; and

(2)     Schedule a TPR hearing instead of the next 6-month review hearing.

(h) (1) (i) Except as provided in subparagraphs (ii) and (iii) of this
paragraph, the court shall conduct a hearing to review the permanency plan at least
every 6 months until commitment is rescinded.

(ii) The court shall conduct a review hearing every 12 months after
the court determines that the child shall be continued in out-of-home placement with
a specific caregiver who agrees to care for the child on a permanent basis.

(iii) 1. Unless the court finds good cause, a case shall be
terminated after the court grants custody and guardianship of the child to a relative
or other individual.

2. If the court finds good cause not to terminate a case, the
court shall conduct a review hearing every 12 months until the case is terminated.

(2) At the review hearing, the court shall:

(i) Determine the continuing necessity for and appropriateness of
the commitment;

(ii) Determine [the extent of compliance] AND DOCUMENT IN ITS
ORDER WHETHER REASONABLE EFFORTS HAVE BEEN MADE TO FINALIZE [with] the
permanency plan THAT IS IN EFFECT;

(iii) Determine the extent of progress that has been made toward
alleviating or mitigating the causes necessitating commitment;

(iv) Project a reasonable date by which a child in placement may be
returned home, placed in a preadoptive home, or placed under a legal guardianship;

(v) Evaluate the safety of the child and take necessary measures to
protect the child; and

(vi) Change the permanency plan if a change in the permanency
plan would be in the child's best interest.

- 1091 -

 

clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Session Laws, 2003
Volume 799, Page 1091   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  October 11, 2023
Maryland State Archives